Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2011's 25 weirdest interview questions.


Floppin

Recommended Posts

# "How would you get an elephant into a refrigerator?" - Asked at Horizon Group Properties.

I used to ask this one to see if people can think on their feet and/or apply prior knowledge. Its usually the first of four questions:

How do you get an elephant in the refrigerator?

-Open the door, insert elephant, close the door.

How do you get a giraffe in the refrigerator?

-Open the door, take out the elephant, insert the giraffe, close the door.

All of the animals are having a meeting. One doesn't show up. Which one?

-The giraffe; he's in the refrigerator.

You have to cross a river. There is no boat and no bridge. Crocodiles are known to swim there. How do you cross?

-Swim across; the crocodiles are at the meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to ask this one to see if people can think on their feet and/or apply prior knowledge. Its usually the first of four questions:

How do you get an elephant in the refrigerator?

-Open the door, insert elephant, close the door.

How do you get a giraffe in the refrigerator?

-Open the door, take out the elephant, insert the giraffe, close the door.

All of the animals are having a meeting. One doesn't show up. Which one?

-The giraffe; he's in the refrigerator.

You have to cross a river. There is no boat and no bridge. Crocodiles are known to swim there. How do you cross?

-Swim across; the crocodiles are at the meeting.

Did you emphasize that the questions are related and not independent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The water level goes down, because the amount of water displaced is reduced since the anchor is in the water instead of in the boat. The amount of water displaced by it's weight while floating is greater than the amount it displaces with it's volume by being sunk.

OK then... That means you would need to know the weight of the anchor vs. the size of the anchor. If you have a small anchor that weighed the same amount as a large anchor, you're going to have different numbers than if you have two anchores of the same size that weigh different???

I'm drunk and dumb!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you emphasize that the questions are related and not independent?

That's why there are four questions. If there were only two, I would tell them. But you expect them to miss the first one, then adjust fire after hearing the answer. That's what you expect a reasonable person to do, at least.

Phone interviews exist to weed out the dummies who had someone do up a resume for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why there are four questions. If there were only two, I would tell them. But you expect them to miss the first one, then adjust fire after hearing the answer. That's what you expect a reasonable person to do, at least.

Phone interviews exist to weed out the dummies who had someone do up a resume for them.

It's an interesting tactic, but I think it could weed out those who merely approached the set of questions with the wrong mindset. :p

Most people overthink questions in interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an interesting tactic, but I think it could weed out those who merely approached the set of questions with the wrong mindset. :p

Most people overthink questions in interviews.

They do. That's why I only ask it in a joking manner now. Turns out, the less educated, "good with their hands" types are the ones who end up answering those types of questions correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...