Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Brockers, DT, LSU


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Have you ever even watched Devon Still?
yeah...and he's pretty good for a couple quarters. where as brockers looks like he starts slow and builds momentum through the game, still looks like he's doing a good job of dealing with double teams the first 2 and a half quarters towards the end of the game he looks like kemo just taking up blockers and as the game goes on lacks a push. i also don't see him keep up the pursuit the way brockers does. looks like he gives up on plays quicker.

both are solid against the run. brockers is better against the pass though. he's got more moves from what i can see and the thing i really like about brockers is he does a good job of getting a hand up and jumping to try and block than still who does that rarely.

i think brockers is quicker and does a better job of getting around blockers.

i think still is fine, but he's just not someone that i think could play more than a couple downs all game. he'll start off being ok with 3 downs but as the game wears on he wears down. i just don't see that with brockers.

still is an ok first round pick, but he's just nothing spectacular and i don't see him as being a particularly dominating force or much of a game changer. i also don't see the potential for growth in him that i do guys like brockers and poe. i think both those guys have more of an upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't talking to you or anyone suggesting we take Brockers. I'm currently of the persuasion Brockers is the best DT prospect on the board and a viable prospect for us.

I mocked Still going to us back in early November or so, after aniticipating we'd be picking around this spot. That was also with the anticipation that he would break out and have a dominant game and establish himself as a top flight candidate and he never did. If he's not busy being "meh" on the field he's busy being injured off of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't talking to you or anyone suggesting we take Brockers. I'm currently of the persuasion Brockers is the best DT prospect on the board and a viable prospect for us.

I mocked Still going to us back in early November or so, after aniticipating we'd be picking around this spot. That was also with the anticipation that he would break out and have a dominant game and establish himself as a top flight candidate and he never did. If he's not busy being "meh" on the field he's busy being injured off of it.

gotcha.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...and he's pretty good for a couple quarters. where as brockers looks like he starts slow and builds momentum through the game, still looks like he's doing a good job of dealing with double teams the first 2 and a half quarters towards the end of the game he looks like kemo just taking up blockers and as the game goes on lacks a push. i also don't see him keep up the pursuit the way brockers does. looks like he gives up on plays quicker.

both are solid against the run. brockers is better against the pass though. he's got more moves from what i can see and the thing i really like about brockers is he does a good job of getting a hand up and jumping to try and block than still who does that rarely.

i think brockers is quicker and does a better job of getting around blockers.

i think still is fine, but he's just not someone that i think could play more than a couple downs all game. he'll start off being ok with 3 downs but as the game wears on he wears down. i just don't see that with brockers.

still is an ok first round pick, but he's just nothing spectacular and i don't see him as being a particularly dominating force or much of a game changer. i also don't see the potential for growth in him that i do guys like brockers and poe. i think both those guys have more of an upside.

When you talk about Devon wearing down, keep in mind Brockers is playing with a better cast where as Penn State has Still, Jordan Hill and that's about it. He is also better than "solid" against the run. That is his strongest attribute, and he is considered bar-none the best run stuffer in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't talking to you or anyone suggesting we take Brockers. I'm currently of the persuasion Brockers is the best DT prospect on the board and a viable prospect for us.

I mocked Still going to us back in early November or so, after aniticipating we'd be picking around this spot. That was also with the anticipation that he would break out and have a dominant game and establish himself as a top flight candidate and he never did. If he's not busy being "meh" on the field he's busy being injured off of it.

Has'nt Missed a game in two straight years. His last injury was a fluke that he worked hard to rehab just so he could make his debut late in the 2008 season, basically losing a year of eligibility just to play a couple of snaps with his teammates(character). 50+ tackles, 17 tfl, 4.5 sacks, all big east/all american, is not "meh". Try again

Have you even watched Devon Still play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't say that his game against the run wasn't his strongest attribute. and i will admit that he was considered the best run stuffer in the draft. brockers is giving him a run for the money in that category.

that would have been the only advantage he has over brockers, though and even if he has one, it's nominal.

against the pass, brockers is significantly better. i think he'll see more PT than still would just because of that and that makes him more valuable.

when the combine comes is when you will really see brockers blow still away. i think still will give a respectable showing, but brockers and poe will probably impress more and may end up passing him by in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be upset if we take a DT with our first pick
if you look at it as just another DT, then i can understand.

if what you are getting is a phenomenal athlete and player and a game changer that will anchor the middle of the Dline for years...i just don't see how you could be upset.

fua and mcclain could be solid in rotation and one of them may be a starter, but if we can get someone that talented and he's legitimately the BPA and it's for a position that we aren't particularly strong at i don't see how you can be upset or pass it up.

btw...there's only a couple DTs in this draft i like. only go for the guy if he's the BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing Still could do to wrestle away the best DT in this draft away from Brockers in my mind.

The desparity between the two's potential is too great. You don't draft players in the top 10 who are "solid contributors" or "nice roleplayers." Brockers has elite potential. Still fits the two previous mention labels. It's Brockers in the first or no DT at all in that round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing Still could do to wrestle away the best DT in this draft away from Brockers in my mind.

The desparity between the two's potential is too great. You don't draft players in the top 10 who are "solid contributors" or "nice roleplayers." Brockers has elite potential. Still fits the two previous mention labels. It's Brockers in the first or no DT at all in that round.

agreed, though if we traded back i wouldn't be upset taking poe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep. the dude is just flat tenacious. he's like a pit bull that just keeps attacking.

he does a really good job of watching the QB while he's pushing back and trying to pop the ball out of the air when it's thrown. great against the run as well. nice reach.

yea he's got those calais campbell tendencies (a high vertical base). Ask any fan in the nfc west how many times this guy bats passes down at the line.

iunno this could be important since we have a 6'0'' QB in our division that's near unstoppable.

Honestly I'm starting to like him more than Kirkpatrick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...