Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Backup Quarterback for Cam


Dex

Recommended Posts

1. He won't be there at the 8th pick.

2. You don't invest first round picks into your frickin' backup QB.

3. RG3 is NOT Cam-lite, people. RG3 is much more in the mold of a speedy Jay Cutler than the physical freak that Cam is, and will probably not utilize very many designed runs at the next level. Whatever team takes him will develop him as the pocket passer he is, not the scrambler everyone imagines him to be because they are retarded.

all black people are the same, what are you talking about? :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to have Russel Wilson back up Cam, but I believe he will be gone by the 3rd and we definitely cannot afford anything other than maybe a 6th rounder on a back up. Even then I probably still wouldn't.

This comes from what many consider to be one of the best analyst out there.

Mayock on #Wisconsin QB Russell Wilson: "Could be Doug Flutie. I mean, that's how good this kid is. Innate understanding of making plays."

More Mayock on Russell Wilson: "He's a playmaker, I don't care how tall he is. He's got a good enough arm. ... That kid is special."

Excited to see where Russell lands. Hoping its not Seattle, Cleveland, or Miami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Golden Calf of Bristol. Yes joking. If your looking for a QB that is no where close to Cam in both style (at least the running style) and leadership he's your guy. Not a real possibility at this point but that's the type of QB we need to stay far away from IMO.

Post is cured of retardation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...