Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Global Peace Index


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

I saw a video a while back (I think it may have been on here) about how the world is way more peaceful today than ever. Very interesting stuff because everyone always thinks we are at the worst of our times.

That book is... a bit controversial, because of the way it was rating "peaceful." It also focused a bit too much on Western Europe imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a video a while back (I think it may have been on here) about how the world is way more peaceful today than ever. Very interesting stuff because everyone always thinks we are at the worst of our times.

i can definitely see that acceptance of violence is far less widespread. we aren't axing teh gays between the legs for buggery, apocalypto scenes are relegated to societal outliers.

doesn't mean it doesn't still happen though, or that we as humanity have improved as vastly as we may think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a video a while back (I think it may have been on here) about how the world is way more peaceful today than ever. Very interesting stuff because everyone always thinks we are at the worst of our times.

Its not surprising to me at least from a military perspective. There just aren't as many major conflicts in the world as there were up until World War II. And given the number of nukes in the world, lets hope it stays that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...