Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming we take Brockers/Coples in the 1st.

Dex

By Dex,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
Posted

I would love to have Sean Spence in the second. Although he is undersized he is extremely quick, has great awareness and tackles like he has superglue on his hands. He bring a fire to our defense as well and even if you think he's too small he would also immediately challenge Martin at safety. He reminds me of a young TD and if he's there in the second I wouldn't have a problem with us taking him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

He's an undersized pursuit LB isn't he? I remember thinking that Beason was small coming out and he is 240. Unless he puts on about 25lbs then I think he struggles getting off blocks.

One guy I actually hope we make a play for in FA to shore up the LB position is Jarrett Johnson. I think he could play strongside linebacker in a lot of schemes similar to Kiwanuka for the Giants (probably even more versatile than Kiwanuka). Pretty sure Johnson is a free agent and the Ravens have got to be looking to get younger at LB at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...