Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The last 25 #59 picks


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

Interesting. I definitely don't have the motivation to do it now, but I think it'd be interesting to look at the last ten years, picks 56-62, to get a wider and more representative sample of the potential value and success rate of players available in that area.

Thanks for posting. Maybe I'll get around to that at some point tomorrow.

We often talk about the negatives of this organization, especially in the offseason...but, in my opinion, one of the MANY positives of this organization has been the quality of our drafting in recent years. There was a post on this, or that moved to this discussion, a few weeks ago so I won't rehash the player by player discussion (also don't have the motivation for that either...)

Point is - I'm pretty confident we'll get a very solid player at that position that will serve us well, and probably immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. I definitely don't have the motivation to do it now, but I think it'd be interesting to look at the last ten years, picks 56-62, to get a wider and more representative sample of the potential value and success rate of players available in that area.

Thanks for posting. Maybe I'll get around to that at some point tomorrow.

We often talk about the negatives of this organization, especially in the offseason...but, in my opinion, one of the MANY positives of this organization has been the quality of our drafting in recent years. There was a post on this, or that moved to this discussion, a few weeks ago so I won't rehash the player by player discussion (also don't have the motivation for that either...)

Point is - I'm pretty confident we'll get a very solid player at that position that will serve us well, and probably immediately.

Ask and you shall receive.... (59-62 since there isn't much point in looking ahead of that spot)

1999

Steelers- Scott Shields S

Chargers- Jermaine Fazande RB

Broncos- Lennie Friedman OG

2000

Colts- Marcus Washington LB

Jaguars- Brad Meester C

Eagles- Bobbie Williams OG

Rams- Jacoby Shepherd CB

2001

Raiders- Marques Tuiasosopo QB

Titans- Andre Dyson CB

Lions- Shaun Rogers DT

Ravens- Gary Baxter CB

2002

Eagles- Sheldon Brown CB

Seahawks- Anton Palepoi DE

Bills- Ryan Denney DE

Steelers- Antwaan Randle El WR

2003

Steelers- Alonzo Jackson LB

Titans- Tyrone Calico WR

Eagles- LJ Smith TE

Chargers- Terrence Kiel S

2004

Browns- Sean Jones S

Saints- Courtney Watson LB

Chiefs- Kris Wilson TE

Panthers- Keary Colbert WR

2005

Falcons- Jonathan Babineaux DT

Colts- Kelvin Hayden CB

Chargers- Vincent Jackson WR

Steelers- Bryant McFadden CB

2006

Buccaneers- Jeremy Truebloood OT

Jaguars- Maurice Jones-Drew RB

Broncos- Tony Scheffler TE

Colts- Tim Jennings CB

2007

Panthers- Ryan Kalil C

Dolphins- Samson Satele C

Lions- Gerald Alexander S

Bears- Dan Bazuin DE

2008

Colts- Mike Pollak C

Packers- Patrick Lee CB

Cowboys- Martellus Bennett TE

Patriots- Terrence Wheatley CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colts- Marcus Washington LB

Jaguars- Brad Meester C

Titans- Andre Dyson CB

Lions- Shaun Rogers DT

Ravens- Gary Baxter CB

Eagles- Sheldon Brown CB

Bills- Ryan Denney DE

Steelers- Antwaan Randle El WR

Eagles- LJ Smith TE

Browns- Sean Jones S

Falcons- Jonathan Babineaux DT

Colts- Kelvin Hayden CB

Chargers- Vincent Jackson WR

Steelers- Bryant McFadden CB

Buccaneers- Jeremy Truebloood OT

Jaguars- Maurice Jones-Drew RB

Broncos- Tony Scheffler TE

Panthers- Ryan Kalil C

Dolphins- Samson Satele C

Patriots- Terrence Wheatley CB

^ All decent and promising talents out of that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...