Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Te Coby Fleener In The Second?


Kuech Da Sneak

Recommended Posts

What do you guys think of the TE out of Stanford?

If you watched any Standford games this or last season, you know how much of a beast he is. Catches pretty much everything that comes his way.

Had a good pro day too. At 6-6, 247, he ran an average of 4.47 (Between Mayock & McShay's watches).

He has the perfect size and speed to make more than enough match up problems, and would fit perfectly in Chud's 2 TE sets.

Some say he won't even make it down to our spot in the 2nd, but if he does, do you take him? I'm in favor of it, even though we need defense.

It's hard to pass up on tall, athletic, proven TEs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Fleener will be a good TE in the league, but we cant use a top pick on a TE. We have too many positions that we don't have starting level talent. Since this team can't afford/refuses to get starter through FA, we have to get a starter with our first 2 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually been thinking for a couple weeks we might pull the trigger on Fleener if he there in the 2nd. Seems like a luxury pick, but Chud loves to utilize TE's and having two weapons like Fleener and Olsen to go along with our other weapons would terrify defensive coordinators. Rather go defense in the 2nd though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is available at our pick in the 2nd that would be stunning. It really is a luxury pick, adding a weapon to an offense that's projected to be one of the best. I like his size and speed, he really could be an amazing pickup.

However I don't think he will be there. Plenty of teams between 9th and 40th picks could use a guy like him. How about an Andrew Luck reunion in Indy?

I'm 50/50 on it. If he's there I think you take him because he could be a star for the next 10 years. To do that you would need to ignore all of our deficiencies on defense for another season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • In 2025 Sam Darnold had over 1k more passing yards than Bryce Young on 1 less pass attempt. Repeat that to yourself several times and let it sink in. I absolutely love it when people come on here and invoke Sam Darnold like some gotcha. Darnold is the physical prototype for what anyone needs in a franchise QB. All the physical tools. Few people thought he would put it all together on the mental side of the position. He used to make some of the worst decisions you would ever see. At times in the past he made up for that with absurd throws and athleticism. But make no mistake whatsoever no matter how you feel about our starting QB. Bryce Young is a completely opposite conundrum. He lacks virtually any and all physical tools and athleticism and his elite processing is really mediocre at best on a good day and horrific on a bad day. These are realities people should have already been addressing instead of quadrupling down in year four.
    • The nice thing about the timing of Bryce's contract at least is that it's going to match up with the 2027 Draft Class. No excuses, he either becomes Rams 2nd half Bryce year long, or we draft his replacement.  Nothing wrong with carrying Bryce on his 5th year expiring and a 1st round rookie waiting in the wings. Let the rookie sit until the trade deadline, deal Bryce to a needy team at the time, profit. 
    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
×
×
  • Create New...