Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carlos Rogers Says Gregg W Had A Bounty Program With Redskins


Panthro

Recommended Posts

Based on what Carlos said, I see nothing wrong with it. I know everytime the Eagles played the Skins everyone would joke as to who's head Williams had the most money on that week. Everyteam had something similar but Williams didn't try to hide it. Now paying players to intentionally injure another player via cheapshot is a diffferent story. I think somewhere along the way his maniacal mind lost grip with reality and he took things too far.

It went on to guys just suggesting stuff in a room,” Rogers said. “If you knock this person out, let’s say a receiver, he comes across the middle. Safety knocks him out, a legal hit, you get this amount of money.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then there's no reason to punish the Saints

The Saints organization is being fined for not stopping it after they were told to stop it. Loomis was aware and did nothing. To punish the redskins the same way you would have to know the FO knew about it,. were warned to stop it and then they did nothing or even worse tried to cover it up. Very different scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see a rationale for punishing the Redskins organization for this, most ikely via fine. Ditto the Bills.

On practical terms though, Williams and probably most of the people who would have been involved in the whole thing are long gone from both organizations. Don't know that it makes sense to penalize the current staffs and rosters on a performance basis (draft picks, suspensions, etc) given that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints organization is being fined for not stopping it after they were told to stop it. Loomis was aware and did nothing. To punish the redskins the same way you would have to know the FO knew about it,. were warned to stop it and then they did nothing or even worse tried to cover it up. Very different scenarios.

i know i just hate the redskins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's getting weird how much you love having me in your mouth.
    • 2023 PFF grades for Carolina's defense Defense: 73.0 (15th) Run Defense: 65.1 (13th) Tackling: 32.0 (32nd) Pressure: 71.5 (21st) Coverage: 79.8 (12th) 2024 PFF grades for Carolina's defense Defense: 44.7 (32nd) Run Defense: 37.5 (32nd) Tackling: 43.3 (21st) Pressure: 51.9 (32nd) Coverage: 50.1 (29th) The 2024 defense was historically bad due to a lack of talent as a result of little-to-no resources being committed during the offseason, poor team building by prior regimes, and injuries to two of its most important players. However, the defense was serviceable 2023 - 2024 with pressure and tackling being the biggest issues (despite not having Jaycee for most of it). I understand that folks are low on Evero because they desperately want a sacrifice for last season's results, but a step back from the ledge shows that it wasn't all terrible in his first season as DC for the team.
    • Alternate between Renfro and Blackshear for now. Simply not muffing the punt is the current goal. As far as Horn goes I'd prefer to not tempt fate with that one given our investment.
×
×
  • Create New...