Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock Torches Coples


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Has him rated as his 50th in his player rankings.Not that I disagree but how can you rate him so low but still have him as the top DE prospect? He has Luke K as number 6 though he believes he will not be drafted that high due to the value of the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea I heard him say he would not take him in the first and maybe even not take him in the second.

I just cant understand how you can rate a player so low to the point he said he may pass on him the 3rd but have him rated as a top DE prospect.Must be the bust potential.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock 2011:

5. Blaine Gabbert

6. Robert Quinn

10. Daquan Bowers

21. Cam Newton

Just to give people insight of how accurate his rankings are. He has legitimate reasoning; however, so I'm not going to fault the low rank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples is the Cam Newton of this draft IMO.

I mean that solely on the polarization of the player not whether I think he will be a good pro.

Well I admit he scares me but I would at least grade him as 2nd round pick.I would be curious where some of the pro scouts have him rated and compare.Polarization is certainly the word that describes it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...