Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Failcons Intrested In Trading For Asante Samuel


philw5289

Recommended Posts

I am hearing from NFL Sirius that the trade to Atlanta is likely and that if they tear up his contract and give him a 4 year deal for 15 million guaranteed and almost all of it is doled out down the road, you could have a cap hit of only 2 million this year. He would take it because he gets 15 million guaranteed which is a lot more than he gets if he stays which is likely being cut.

Unless he doesn't want to play for McDermott I wonder why we aren't considering this deal unless we are looking down the road and figuring we don't want to pay 15 million to rent him for a year or two. Atlanta may see that they are stuck with Grimes this year once he signed the tag but getting Samuels allows them to dump him next year and are willing to pay the money on a short rental for Samuels and this will force Grimes to sign a long term deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...