Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers To Take Blackmon If He Falls To 9....

MGH1989

By MGH1989,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherBrew Newbie

PantherBrew

Posted
Posted

Anything leaked from the Panthers is for a purpose.

They are don't usually let stuff out unless they want to.

Could be posturing for a trade down if blackmon slips.

Could also be tempting someone to trade above us, if they want blackmon.

That being said, I would not be shocked if they did take blackmon there, and I would be okay with it.

I think he could be the next T.O. without the drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

This draft is weird...I would actually be happy with any possible guy with slight gas face toward Coples and Poe.

-I think Coples is Hardy 2.0 so it would be a wasted pick IMO.

Panthers do need a good push up the middle with a DT but how much better are the top guys in this draft compared to Free agents remaining, The Dts on the roster.

I think there is a wider seperation with our no. 2 cbs and the Gilmores, Jenkins..possibly Kirpatrick(at safety)

I think we should avoid a first round wr as I think the lafell, Gettis will be servicible if not taking a jump in production. LaFell had a second rd grade and was considered more of a play maker than Ruben Randle, who is considered a late first or second guy (for some reason). LaFell is on the verge of a massive improvement IMO.

Luke* and a DeCastro are considerablly better than what we have...after Beason and Anderson of course:healty Davis is a pipedream.

If Beason and Davis are injured everyone would be reto drafting Luke of our lbers.

My dark horse is Ingram to be a LOLB! What? Conversion hybrid Lbers...Rivera like that shat..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackofalltrades Proficient

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

LOLB? We don't run enough 34 looks to justify that, IMO. Now, if he could play DE on passing downs and SLB on 3rd and long then sure, but in the too 10 I think you have to have a 3 down guy, like Kuechley.

Ingram and Richardson are the only two I really don't want and I'm not a fan of drafting OG at 9 either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • strato
      Panthers 2026 schedule

      By strato · Posted

      I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • strato
      Joe Person Draft Weekend inside info

      By strato · Posted

      Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...