Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did The Browns Do The Worst Trade Ever?


malik

Recommended Posts

The Cleveland Browns, according to multiple reports, have moved up one spot in the draft, giving Minnesota their first-, fourth-, fifth- and seventh-round picks to do so

all that for one spot, to a team who already had a stud RB and were going for OT all the damn time? lmao!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they were worried TB would possibly trade up for Richardson I guess

I thought it was a horrible move but I can't decide if which of their 1st round picks was worse

giving up 3 picks to move up one spot and take a RB #3 overall.... or taking a QB that'll be 29 this season and still needs time to develop with their other 1st

Browns continue to be the Browns, what else can you say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the way the browns see it they got their franchise RB and franchise QB in one hour on Thursday night.

the tape on that QB is outstanding and they can still get two contracts out of him even at 28.

They desperately needed Trent Richardson and there were multiple teams looking to move ahead of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, as others have said, this was a pick to make 100% sure that no one would trade with Minny. I bet the Vikings were on the phone with Cleveland saying "We have multiple trade partners, we are going to give you a chance to move up"

But if I'm Cleveland, I draft Tannehill at 4 or trade down to take him and wait until 22 and get either take David Wilson or Doug Martin, or trade down to take Wilson or Martin, just because it's a QB driven league and Colt McCoy sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think quite the opposite.

They desperately wanted Richardson and they knew that TB (especially) would try to jump them by trading to Minny. The trade protected them from the Vikings trading the pick to someone else...not from the Vikings taking Richardson.

Taken that way it was actually a very good trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...