Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New York State Court: It's Ok To Look At Child Porn, But Not Own It.

charlotte49er

By charlotte49er,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/08/11602955-viewing-child-porn-on-the-web-legal-in-new-york-state-appeals-court-finds?lite

Viewing child pornography online isn't a crime, the New York Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday in the case of a college professor whose work computer was found to have stored more than a hundred illegal images in its Web cache.

WTH??? Look at it, but not to store it on your computer. Another thing to hate about New York! (Other than the Giants, who play in New Jersey.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pOpCoRnPoPpEr Newbie

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

Posted
Posted

lol I was going to post this link earlier...then i thought, with my strange reputation i better wait and let someone else do it.

"Viewing" is the key word. Downloading is still illegal. I don't really understand the rules myself. So its ok to look at the photos on the internet but you can't down load them? Weird, i guess downloading is viewed as possession?? Bad ruling IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pOpCoRnPoPpEr Newbie

pOpCoRnPoPpEr

Posted
Posted

lolI was going to post this link earlier...then i thought, with my strange reputation i better wait and let someone else do it.

"Viewing" is the key word. Downloading is still illegal. I don't really understand the rules myself. So its ok to look at the photos on the internet but you can't down load them? Weird, i guess downloading is viewed as possession?? Bad ruling IMO

I mean really. Could someone just create a new site and post pictures from another site and say he/she was "just viewing" and not actually download anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • CmC2k
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By CmC2k · Posted

      Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...