Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will The Bucs Have A Better Record Than Us?


heyyall

Recommended Posts

Tampa Bay is way overrated. Greg Schiano is a huge unknown, Bowers is already done for the year, & Josh Freeman is a mediocre QB. They had a good draft & signed a lot of big time free agents but they were still awful last year. Besides, if all it took was over paying big name free agents to win the Redskins would win the Super Bowl every year.

Wouldn't surprise me if Carolina doubles Tampa's win total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Bucs will have a decent record this coming year, they did start the season 4-2, we ended the season 4-2, I don't think they suc as much as people seem to think, they will be a tough opponent for us and many more teams next season, we do play the AFC west, and the AFC west is inconsistent, SD, KC and Oakland could be beat by the Bucs, Manning in Denver scares me, because if he plays at the level he has played in the last 10 plus years, the Broncos should be a 11 plus win team... I wouldn't sleep on the Bucs.....

Bucs will play the Vikes, Rams, AFC WEST, NFC East, and then our Div,

I think if they play at a decent level, they can beat the Vikes, Rams, KC, OAK, Saints* (once, they seem to be able to split with them), Falcons once, Skins, and maybe have 1-2 upset wins.. thats 7-9 record to 9-7 record......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Bucs will have a decent record this coming year, they did start the season 4-2, we ended the season 4-2, I don't think they suc as much as people seem to think, they will be a tough opponent for us and many more teams next season, we do play the AFC west, and the AFC west is inconsistent, SD, KC and Oakland could be beat by the Bucs, Manning in Denver scares me, because if he plays at the level he has played in the last 10 plus years, the Broncos should be a 11 plus win team... I wouldn't sleep on the Bucs.....

Bucs will play the Vikes, Rams, AFC WEST, NFC East, and then our Div,

I think if they play at a decent level, they can beat the Vikes, Rams, KC, OAK, Saints** (once, they seem to be able to split with them), Falcons once, Skins, and maybe have 1-2 upset wins.. thats 7-9 record to 9-7 record......

Kansas City, Oakland, and Minnesota are going to be improved just like the Bucs.

The Bucs may have improved but so have other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm being fooled, cause I say doubtful?

They are a division rival. Im not over looking them at all.

On paper, they have improved their team.

They still have to go out and execute.

what's the chance they are under estimating us?

Exactly. Stop posting foolishness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm being fooled, cause I say doubtful?

They are a division rival. Im not over looking them at all.

On paper, they have improved their team.

They still have to go out and execute.

what's the chance they are under estimating us?

Exactly. Stop posting foolishness.

Did I fuging quote you? Jesus Christ, you fuging need to get your hormones under control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...