Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam At Preakness


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Cam's looking swagalicious.

Also, I'd rather he have a steady girlfriend than be off chasing tail all the time. I imagine it will benefit the team if Cam can consistently ......er..... "release the pressure" before games.

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appease her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appeasIe her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

I'm guessing you are not a hit with the ladies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appease her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

You say emotionally attached, I think emotionally supported. I think it'd be good for Cam to have someone other than a Gatorade towel to turn to after a tough loss. I don't think a girl would get in his head because, there's nothing in Cam's head but football. As for girls being programmed to annoy, control and demand attention, yeah psycho bitches maybe. But assuming this chick in purple isn't one of those then he's in the clear.

Moreover, even though Cam's a celebrity isn't not like he can get laid at will. He still has to go out, find a girl, spit some game and then take them home. Compare that to just rolling over and getting it on with a girlfriend. That's valuable time saved that can be spent on watching film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...