Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason..."kuechly Safer Pick Than Both Luck And Griffin"


Recommended Posts

http://profootballta...uck-or-griffin/

Beason states that Luke was a safer pick than both Luck and Griffin because the two young quarterbacks will need pieces around them to succeed. I think all three of these players have excellent careers ahead of them but Luke will see his success much earlier simply because the transition from a college to an NFL LBer is easier than it is for a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

I'd say he's about as safe. LB is the QB of the defense.

Gotta love Beast backing his players up like his job title entitles him too though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beason talks too much.

I do not remember him talking this often during previous off-seasons. I believe he is just fed up with all the naysayers and doubters of this franchise. He knows we have the pieces to the puzzle now and once this season gets going the Panthers should get on the map and make some teams realize we are not the Panthers of just a couple years ago. The man has stated its not about being cocky, but about confidence. I do not have a problem with our All-Pro MLB defending this franchise and his teammates and I do not think any Panther fan should either.

My .02c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not remember him talking this often during previous off-seasons. I believe he is just fed up with all the naysayers and doubters of this franchise. He knows we have the pieces to the puzzle now and once this season gets going the Panthers should get on the map and make some teams realize we are not the Panthers of just a couple years ago. The man has stated its not about being cocky, but about confidence. I do not have a problem with our All-Pro MLB defending this franchise and his teammates and I do not think any Panther fan should either.

My .02c

I personally have no problem with it but if he wants to shut up the doubters the Panthers need to win. Until they do that consistently, all the talk in the world don't mean poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was asked numerous questions by the Observer and gave his 2 cent on the Kuechly pick so please stfu.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/05/26/3269942/safe-pick-luke-kuechly-pads-carolina.html#storylink=cpy

So when an opposing player is asked questions & gives answers stating his .02 cents & mentions an opposing player everyone bashes him to hell & back saying how dare he. But when a Panther does the exact same thing it's okay because he's confident? Get real. Beason could have praised Luke without mentioning the top 2 picks in the draft by name. He's just stirring poo up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...