Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vote To Remove Rep


jtnc

Remove rep  

106 members have voted

  1. 1. Remove rep?

    • No
      48
    • Yes
      42
    • Pie
      21


Recommended Posts

On a side note, anyone want to clue me in on where my "New Panthers Blog" thread went? I thought I made it pretty clear that it was a Panthers news blog, not a direct competitor for the Huddle, but. . .well, you know the implication.

And yes, rep should be gone, because it just ends up being used as a means to attack more often than commend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

I just think there shouldn't be a neg rep button, because that's how little kids/trolls abuse the system.

Even though it's a meaningless number, your rep on here are points earned by sharing good knowledge or just being a cool dude. You shouldn't be able to lose anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think there shouldn't be a neg rep button, because that's how little kids/trolls abuse the system.

Even though it's a meaningless number, your rep on here are points earned by sharing good knowledge or just being a cool dude. You shouldn't be able to lose anything.

Agreed. Only give positive rep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...