Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What sections do you own psls in/favorite places to sit?

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

I am looking to score a good deal on affordable tickets for the season and am torn on where I should sit. I am currently close to pulling the trigger on some in 234 (1 section over from club). My personal favorites that I have sat in are 132 row 11 (48 yard line) and ones similar to that are going 4x the face, so thats a no go for me. Just want to make sure I make good decision, thanks for any input on this redundant thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I sit in 252 (skinny section next to the club seats) and I love it.

I think 234 is very similar to that, just on the other side of the panthers sideline. My only reservations are I have bought upper level season tickets before and regretted it later(just to far from the action for me). If you know anyone selling in your section for face please let me know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KendrickPanther Apprentice

KendrickPanther

Posted
Posted

234 is a Great spot to sit. No sun in your eyes. Relatively close to the action. I'm not sure if the seats are 19 inches like most blue seats or 21 inches like the grey seats but that would be a nice bonus if they are 21. I would jump all over some reasonably priced 234s. I like being up in the club because you can see more of the field without the arduous journey to the upper deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CLG Experienced

CLG

Posted
Posted

I am looking to score a good deal on affordable tickets for the season and am torn on where I should sit. I am currently close to pulling the trigger on some in 234 (1 section over from club). My personal favorites that I have sat in are 132 row 11 (48 yard line) and ones similar to that are going 4x the face, so thats a no go for me. Just want to make sure I make good decision, thanks for any input on this redundant thread.

i got tickets for 135. Ever been that way before and how do you think my view will be. I think im near the south gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...