Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stan Lee


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

Stan Lee is a Comic Book Genius and God!

The Fantastic 4, Thor and Captain America that were made without him, were terrible.

Hitchcock was great at cameos, though, he didn't have speaking roles. Clive Cussler does cameos in all his Dirt Pitt novels. I don't see why Stan can't do cameos in his films.

Even though I haven't been impressed with the Hulk movies, the rest of them have been good.

For some reason, I expect Stan to pop up in a Warehouse 13 episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stan Lee is a Comic Book Genius and God!

The Fantastic 4, Thor and Captain America that were made without him, were terrible.

Hitchcock was great at cameos, though, he didn't have speaking roles. Clive Cussler does cameos in all his Dirt Pitt novels. I don't see why Stan can't do cameos in his films.

Even though I haven't been impressed with the Hulk movies, the rest of them have been good.

For some reason, I expect Stan to pop up in a Warehouse 13 episode.

I'll debate you on the Thor/Cap statement. Thor, while it could have had MORE in it, was decent enough. I thought Cap was great, though. It's just that Cap is honestly so cookie-cutter as far as a character goes that it's hard to make him appealing in the same way that Iron Man or Hulk are. I honestly think both the Thor and Cap sequels will be much better than their respective first movies. I will agree though that Fantastic 4 was fuging terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...