Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stan Lee

cookinbrak

By cookinbrak,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

Stan Lee is a Comic Book Genius and God!

The Fantastic 4, Thor and Captain America that were made without him, were terrible.

Hitchcock was great at cameos, though, he didn't have speaking roles. Clive Cussler does cameos in all his Dirt Pitt novels. I don't see why Stan can't do cameos in his films.

Even though I haven't been impressed with the Hulk movies, the rest of them have been good.

For some reason, I expect Stan to pop up in a Warehouse 13 episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

Stan Lee is a Comic Book Genius and God!

The Fantastic 4, Thor and Captain America that were made without him, were terrible.

Hitchcock was great at cameos, though, he didn't have speaking roles. Clive Cussler does cameos in all his Dirt Pitt novels. I don't see why Stan can't do cameos in his films.

Even though I haven't been impressed with the Hulk movies, the rest of them have been good.

For some reason, I expect Stan to pop up in a Warehouse 13 episode.

I'll debate you on the Thor/Cap statement. Thor, while it could have had MORE in it, was decent enough. I thought Cap was great, though. It's just that Cap is honestly so cookie-cutter as far as a character goes that it's hard to make him appealing in the same way that Iron Man or Hulk are. I honestly think both the Thor and Cap sequels will be much better than their respective first movies. I will agree though that Fantastic 4 was fuging terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By CRA · Posted

      PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • strato
      Vet QB Options - Trade/Cut/FA Edition

      By strato · Posted

      Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • kungfoodude
      Vet QB Options - Trade/Cut/FA Edition

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...