Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legal question. Rental Car Company.


Kettle

Recommended Posts

Long story short I hit a rental car. The damages were minimal, and my insurance took care of them. What they didn't take care of though were some fees that the rental company is now asking me to pay out of pocket. Administration, loss of use, and loss of value total up to ~$420. The insurance company does not pay these things because there is no quantifiable proof behind them.

If I don't pay, what sort of action or consequence can I expect? The rental representative has not returned my call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said that in a nice way on the voice mail I left. I told them it seemed like they were just trying to squeeze some extra cash out of me. I'm hoping they'll leave me alone now that I have called, but I don't expect them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything I see online in regards to this is for when you rent a car from a rental company, not when you're at fault in an accident. I don't see that they have much to stand on in this case, because you're not the one who signed the rental contract.... but I would ask someone else, and if they don't contact you about it fug 'em. Only issue is if they turn it over to collections... but I really don't see how they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fug them what can they do? You didn't rent the car nor do they have anything with you social so they can't ding your credit.

They are not going to get a lawyer over 420 bucks of frivolous charges. Do us all a favor and tell its what shitttyass company it is so we can avoid using them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contacted my insurance before calling the rental company and they could offer no advice as it is not their specialty. Enterprise is the company.

My first instinct would be to make my insurance company deal with it. That is why you pay them every month. I'm not saying they should pay it they should just handle it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...