Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's That Time Again... The Armanti Thread


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Hopefully this version will be free of App St. homerism and full of objective discussion.

In all fairness, from what I saw of him last night, he looked better than he ever has over the last two years. He looked the most natural he ever has as a wide receiver and returner. He seemed much more decisive on his return, made his move, and cut it up field. As a receiver, he looked so much more fluid in route running and catching. I actually had to look twice to make sure it was him.

That being said, he has spent two years to get to this point and the fanbase has already written him off (I pretty much already did prior to last night). Has the front office and coaching staff as well? Even if they haven't, I honestly just don't see how he makes the team with the emergence of Tutu, the return of Gettis, the addition of Murphy, possibly expanding Pilares' role as a WR, and with Joe Adams as a returner/spot WR.

There is no doubt he looks much improved, but it seems too little, too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, maybe I'm just showing my ignorance here, but while he seemed more decisive and adept at catching the ball last night than he ever has before, I saw that he still seems to just run straight to the part of the field that's all clogged up with large men seeking to do the returner bodily harm. Is there an issue with field vision that makes his returns so pedestrian?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, but I guess I'm saying is there anyway his improvement as a WR and returner (in addition to his potential ability in wildcat packages) present enough versatility to keep him around?

I'm all but sure Adams will be the starting returner, at least as the PR, once the season starts. I think it'll come down to whether he's one of the top 5 receivers on the roster. His versatility could give him an edge, but I just don't see him beating out Pilares or Adams regardless for the last spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He looked "marginally better" than he has in preseasons past. He did not look "much improved" to me.

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

I don't even know what the saying is for fool me three times.

In Armanti's case as a receiver though, looking at his past performances, "marginally" is equal to "much improved" in my mind. Any improvement is "much improved" because he looked so out of his element in his first two seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Armanti did look a tad bit better, but, the thing is, there's only a certain number of spots available to him on the roster.

With our WRs looking something like:

WR1: Smitty

WR2: LaFell

WR3: Murphy/Gettis

WR4: Gettis/Murphy

WR5: Pilares (KR)

WR6: Adams (PR)

Where is there room for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, yes, I'm a homer.

Now, AE didn't get in the game until the third quarter. Clausen was already in the game, so other than two kick returns (total of 45 yards), he didn't have much of an opportunity to be evaluated. If you look at just stats, he looked pretty good on kick returns and was fourth in receiving yards (one pass caught). I don't think anyone can say from this limited time on the field that he has made improvement or not-- other than what has been observed at camp. Perhaps if he gets some time with on the field with someone other than Clausen we could see if he has what it takes or not.

As a Panthers fan I want to see the best guy out there and if it isn't AE, so be it. With this said, I don't think I saw enough of anyone to start feeling like anybody is a lock -- except maybe for SS.

And unlike many of the crazy fans and haters on this board, I'm confident that the coaches will pick the best players and if we see AE make the cut, he deserved it. It won't be because they are just trying to piss everybody off. At this point he's been given all of the chances one could expect, so it is what it is.

Of course, I was going to add that AE would be better at QB than Clausen, but then I realized that I would be better than Clausen. At 5'9", 150, I could easily be sacked every other play and I probably wouldn't complete any passes. I'd also go 3 and out regularly. See, just like Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...