Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teacher Accused of Having Group Sex With Students on Video.

Nine_Lives

By Nine_Lives,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Nine_Lives Newbie

Nine_Lives

Posted
Posted

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/teacher-accused-having-group-sex-students-video-134339076--abc-news-topstories.html

A former Texas high school English teacher and mother of three is on trial, accused of having sex with five male students. The evidence against Brittni Colleps, 28, includes cell phone video that allegedly shows group sex between her and four students at her home. Prosecutors say it happened while her children and husband, who is an Army specialist stationed out-of-state, were away. The graphic video was shown to the jury this week.

Here's the kicker, ALL FIVE are 18 years of age. So, should she face 20 years in jail?? I think not. Fired of course but jail hell no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nine_Lives Newbie

Nine_Lives

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fired of course, but why would she go to jail if they were all 18... unless she forced or raped them in some way.

I think it was just her fantasy come true. Haha four football players at one time. I don't even believe they were drinking. The article never says. I still don't see any laws she broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

I mean it's certainly unethical to have sex with your students, whether they are of legal age or not... if the school system has a policy against it, which I'm sure it does, she should obviously be fired, but I was not aware that it was an actual LAW that you can't sleep with 'of age' students... Surely college professors do this regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Niner National Newbie

Niner National

Posted
Posted

I mean it's certainly unethical to have sex with your students, whether they are of legal age or not... if the school system has a policy against it, which I'm sure it does, she should obviously be fired, but I was not aware that it was an actual LAW that you can't sleep with 'of age' students... Surely college professors do this regularly.

It is definitely illegal to sleep with a student of age because you are considered to have a position of influence over them.

I don't think that exists at the college level, but I'm sure most schools have policies against it.

I had a HS teacher that slept with an 18 year old student. He was arrested for it, but I don't know if he actually did any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Bwood

Guest Bwood

Posted
Posted

Yea I was really expecting to see the video haha.

The teacher isn't really that good looking whatsoever though. The kid that they interviewed sounded black so I'm gonna assume this is just another crazy white women that wanted to get plowed by 4 black guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Who will blow it Sunday?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • kungfoodude
      Passer Rating Differential: A Key to predicting a teams playoff and championship potential.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • kungfoodude
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...