Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Haruki Nakamura #1 FS.


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

Hey dumbass why don't you read the whole thread. The post was in response to the Spoon vs Morgan debate the thread had derailed to.

PS: If my post are so irrelevant. Then why do you keep reading them?

i know it was in response to the spoon vs morgan debate. still irrelevant to the discussion and more importantly your stance.

PS: they glow with stupidity, they're hard to ignore

PSS: dumbass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I agree but I don't think that Rivera agrees since we just signed Godfrey to a 5 yr extension.

That was a Hurney move....Godfrey got that before playing under Rivera. Martin is gone bc Rivera(Carolina) doesn't need to have 2 S that cant play extended and hurting the team.

Rivera got stuck with certain players temporarily. He has to use them.....has to praise them. We extended a lot of guys to big money before Rivera walked through that door.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

link?? Because this says different.

http://local.gastongazette.com/panthers_retro/page_worst_moves.htm

that is an opinion piece, that doesn't state value at all.

Sorry that i don't have the link handy.

I proved this years ago, with hard values stated., wiyh link to back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the difference between being a starting olb and a starting mlb. Go figure.

Also figured you would down.play it.

Lol

I'm down playing a 4million dollar difference?

So if you had your choice in jobs you would take 1 paying 4 million less?

You could never negotiate a contract for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know it was in response to the spoon vs morgan debate. still irrelevant to the discussion and more importantly your stance.

PS: they glow with stupidity, they're hard to ignore

PSS: dumbass

Again dumbass you choose to waste your time reading my irrelevant post. When you could have reply to all the discussion on Naka and Martin and move the fug on.

"You" dumbass made may post relevant to "you" when "you" choose to reply dumbass.

You could have just ignored the whole debate we were having but again you're a dumbass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Haruki. He can add something to this squad. I agree that tackling and communication are big deals, and he should bring that. I don't know that he's a better matchup, but it's something the team has to trade off on.

Hopefully Martin can remain useful for the year. For whatever it's worth, he was drafted to be a cover 2 safety, which requires less mentally and more physically. The upside is he's done well on special teams, so he'll remain an asset for the year.

FWIW, here are some more on the numbers with Godfrey/Martin. Neither were good in coverage either, last year. Plenty of things went wrong last year, and clearly Ron Meeks was sent off with that in mind - Steve Wilks is so much better, in my opinion - but neither safety was good last year and while I'd have been fine with Godfrey's contract if he could've repeated 2010, when he was not as good as Martin in QB rating but did have 5 picks on a team that was terrible, they could have simply waited out the year and watch him be poor in 2011.

The problem was, the 5 picks were the only real high point - he had 18 missed tackled in 2010 - more than Martin's 15.

But, we're more or less stuck with Godfrey, so hopefully JR's right about him being a leader, and hopefully coaching can make him into a difference maker again.

Oh, and while I'm wishing, maybe they won't play him as close to the line so often this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again dumbass you choose to waste your time reading my irrelevant post. When you could have reply to all the discussion on Naka and Martin and move the fug on.

"You" dumbass made may post relevant to "you" when "you" choose to reply dumbass.

You could have just ignored the whole debate we were having but again you're a dumbass.

wat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...