Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tebow Subterfuge of Cam's Rushing TD's

redbuddha

By redbuddha,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

redbuddha Newbie

redbuddha

Posted
Posted

All he does is win! That's what they tell you, but lets face facts. The Golden Calf of Bristol is a 47% for his career qb. The Golden Calf of Bristol's strength is in his run game. His biggest play in the game was his run against the Panthers.

Stephen A. Smith wrote an article on espn, that quoted a jets defensive player saying we only need 17 points a game to win. This is in a league where the winning team usually has to score over 21 points.

http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football/ffl/story?page=nfldk2k12_decisionstebow

I'm starting to believe that Rex Ryan, who has already stated there will be a Wildcat or The Golden Calf of Bristol Package near the goal line, will have Sanchez who he appears to not like march down the field, pull him out and put The Golden Calf of Bristol in. Even if they score only 1-2 td's a game, The Golden Calf of Bristol would easily have 16 rushing td's, because really, do you expect Rex to have Tim throw it. Hell he doesn't trust Sanchez to throw it.

Up for discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites
footballisasport Newbie

footballisasport

Posted
Posted

All I've got to say is.. Sport media now call the shots when it comes to the NFL. They now tell us who to like and accept. Whose flaws and playing style they want us to accept. And no matter how much you have accomplished, you're not good unless they say so.

So in order words, The Golden Calf of Bristol will be helped by the team to make him look good so those folks who spend endless hours worshipping his false accomplishments can now start giving him credits for all of the Jets wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...