Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Cam Newton rant.


FirstRoundPick

Recommended Posts

Cam does not play defense which is the real reason we lost and will continue to lose. Cam was pretty much carrying the offense himself and was the main reason we were in the game. Cams own man helped knocked the ball out not that it matters because Cam has to play perfect with this shitty defense, and he wasn't perfect yesterday.

Blame the defense.

Oh look Micheal Turner is back to his normal self. I wonder why?

Here is visual evidence of their ineptitude all day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCjDtwFROrM

Blame McDermott

After giving up the huge play, you have to know they will use the flats and sidelines to stop the clock. Giving up those two other plays is just plain dumb.

Blame Rivera

The overwhelmed comatose statue, cant trust Newton, Stewart and Tolbert to get us an inch. What is Hurney giving them so much money for? Nevermind. Pinning them on the one yard line wasn't a sure thing and was about 3 inches away from being a touchback. Twenty yard line would have been a disaster, one yard line gave us a good chance, but not as good as getting an inch with Cam Newton as your QB.

Blame Nakamura

Jesus Christ! Even the sugar coaters blame him. Norman did his part on the the long bomb to White. Hard to tell if Norman was bad yesterday or if Naka just kept screwing up.

Blame Captain

That PI was horrendous as long as you dont let Jones get any YAC, and definitely not to the sideline, and that would have been great.

Dont blame the player who played best on our team. This loss is not on Cam. Without him, we get blown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

Defense was bad all game. Mostly the secondary. You could have put Colin Branch or Deke Cooper in over Naka and I think we would have won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone likes to say we wouldn't have been in the game without Cam. Thats true but we also wouldn't have been in the game without Nakamura's interception in the end zone in the first quarter or the 7 sacks the Defense turned in You win as a team and you lose as a team. Plays made in the first half count the same as those made at the end.

I'm pretty sure we would have been in the game without nakamuras interception, but not without the pressure the dl was bringing all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...