Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roll Call - Seaguls at Panthers - Who is going?


Zod

Recommended Posts

As long as we're not getting things thrown our way and the swearing isn't over the top obnoxious, some heckling is all in good fun to me and should be expected. I just don't want my kids or parents to have to worry about fights or beer "spilled" on them.

.

Nah I never throw stuff but I get pretty obnoxious verbally. Kids or old people will generally cause me to turn my ire elsewhere. If you are a mid-20 to late 50 male with no kids or old people though, it's on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a 4:00 game, so people will have 3 hours more of booze in their system, but you probably won't see too much obnoxiousness going around.

Panthers fans are knocked as being a wine and cheese crowd -- so you will be fine.

Just don't let them see you drinking a Cabernet with your Smoked Gouda, they will break bad on your ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok cool, I don't mind it too much myself, but my parents are in their 60s and my boys are both under 3 so I have to watch out for them. Thanks for your input and heres to a good game.

you shouldn't take a child to a football game under 6 or 7.........

3 is way too young but, good luck............with the kids of course. Fu*k the Seahags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...