Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Falcons are pretenders..


PantherTrain84

Recommended Posts

Chiefs

Broncos

Raiders

Chargers

Panthers

Redskins.

Those are the teams they have played. Is it eally a wonder why this team is 6-0? They might literally have the easiest schedule in the league. I know you can say "but no such thing as easy wins in this league." But come on, lets get real. Only played one playoff team from last year. NONE of the teams they have played this year has a winning record. Can we please hold off on the Matt Ryan MVP talk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've earned it, but they were losing to the Foreskins until RGIII went down. We and the Raiders had them down with the full field to drive with under two minutes at home.

They're 6-0, but they could very easily be 3-3. That's what good teams do, they win the games they should win. Too bad we can't figure that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the thing about the Falcons though.... I believe they are Legit... They find ways to win... As opposed to us, we're still trying to figure that whole winning thing out. They have mastered it.

As a caveat, I'll also say that I have no faith in them in the playoffs... Whether it be at home, or on the rd.

Also, we whipped them all over their field... If they're being touted as the best team in the League... Then that says something about our squad as well. I know that everyone here, myself included has damn near given up on us this year... But if we get to .500 at any point this year watch out.

"I'm TCF, and I approved this message"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why are most NFL refs senior citizens lol
    • I can't speak to the sample size on the double ACL tears, I could look into it but I am unsure about the quality of data I am able to find. Anecdotally, I don't think that is common for sure.  Well one giant red flag for Dobbins is that of the 3-5 serious injuries he has had in his NFL career, 100% of them have been the same leg. That's not good and it doesn't bode well for his longevity at all. As I have said several hundred times in this forum(in this case it will be in regards to Thomas Davis), outliers are memorable for a reason....because they are outliers. You don't base your decision making on outliers. That's.....stupid. I am also not high on Etienne but he does play special teams and Brooks does not. Currently, I couldn't blame anyone in the FO for choosing a 3rd string RB that can play special teams and has actually played more than 23 career snaps in the NFL in 2+ seasons.  I am not advocating for cutting Brooks but I don't think it's a player I would consider for anything other than a 3rd string role(and likely competing for it, at that) if I am building a roster for 2026. It's not like they are going to get to see him at 100% in 2026.
    • I'm not going to argue against black helmets, but love our silver helmets. No one has anything similar. If you took all the logos off all 32 team's helmets, you could pick out our helmet easy. 
×
×
  • Create New...