Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 1st down stats


MattB

Recommended Posts

Really interesting article on the discrepancy between the Panthers great 1st down numbers and the struggles on 3rd down. Perhaps this goes back to what Rivera was saying about Cam needing to check the ball down more.

The Panthers have three plays over 35 yards (66, 51, and 40) but they also have two losses of -12 yards and -9 yards. They have made 45 percent of needed yardage on 48 percent of first downs, which is third in the NFL behind San Francisco and New England. Cam Newton is completing 71 percent of his passes on first down, 56 percent on second down, and 41 percent on third or fourth down.

Perhaps part of the problem is that the Panthers have forgotten that they employ running backs on third down. Panthers running backs have only three carries on third down all season -- two on third-and-1, and one on third-and-2. They have thrown only four passes to running backs on third down (NFL average is seven, and that includes the six teams with one fewer game played.)

http://www.footballo...ffensive-splits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine that... We suck on 3rd downs... We'd have a better 3rd down conversion rate if we just punted on 3rd downs to save us the embarrassment.

Hopefully, our coaches are as smart as these writers are and have identified this discrepancy and rectified the issue.

I'm just waiting for Sunday to roll around so we can see if its really over or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't stay on schedule on first and second down, you put yourself behind. Defenses can attack on those third and longs. Which just makes it that much tougher to convert.

Personally, I think Chud is outsmarting himself on first and seccond downs. Trying to be cute and all trickery. Because he trusts Cam to convert those third downs. Problem is, we are always in third and long. Hard to confuse the D when you are behind the eight ball.

IMO, if Chud would use first and second downs to actually move the ball, the third downs would be much easier to convert. And we could actually dictate to the D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, if Chud would use first and second downs to actually move the ball, the third downs would be much easier to convert. And we could actually dictate to the D.

You need to remove first down from that equation. We average 7.2 yards per play on first down.

Play selection after first down has been abysmal - that's where we need to be properly utilizing our personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't stay on schedule on first and second down, you put yourself behind. Defenses can attack on those third and longs. Which just makes it that much tougher to convert.

Personally, I think Chud is outsmarting himself on first and seccond downs. Trying to be cute and all trickery. Because he trusts Cam to convert those third downs. Problem is, we are always in third and long. Hard to confuse the D when you are behind the eight ball.

IMO, if Chud would use first and second downs to actually move the ball, the third downs would be much easier to convert. And we could actually dictate to the D.

Clearly you didn't read the OP. It explicitly states we do our best work on first down (average 7.28 yards per play on 1st down, best in the league) and our second and third downs are atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that does put a crimp in my theory.

So... if we are so good on first down. Why are we not more successful?

Because we cannot seem to stop shooting ourselves in the foot. A bad play call, a penalty, bad pass, dropped pass, or any mistake under the sun. And always at the worst posible time.

So-so play calling and the execution of those plays has been the main problem. Slap Chud and all should be well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't want to create a brand new thread for this, and since FO stuff is based on advanced stats, I thought it made sense here.

According to a statistical model, the Panthers are the 6th best team in the league.

lol wut?

http://www.advancedn...ngs-week-7.html

Hmmmm. So what does that tell us...perhaps that we've just played really good competition and are about to breakout, or we are winning much less than you would expect. To me, the latter scenario speaks more to coaching than talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...