Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

boobs


Jase

Recommended Posts

Sag yes... shrink, idk. I always thought it was linked to weight gain/loss...

Joking aside, biscuit makes a good point. I have heard of them shrinking from weight loss. Also the obvious getting bigger when producing milk then going back down when no longer producing milk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right Biscuit...unless you gain or lose weight..boobies just go...down :)

that being said..When I swelled up to cow size, my boobs were DD's...lost 50 lbs...they're now D's...but 12 years ago they were C's when I first met MrPF...and I'm the same size now as I was then...don't think muh boobs will ever be C's again :(....though I thought MrPF was going to cry ...it's like he could see them shrinking by the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isn't your wife on a diet/excercise program?

boobs are mostly fatty deposits, over time the breast tissue diminishes leaving only said fatty deposits. Lose weight=lose boobs, ask MPF (I really don't mean that in a bad way, she's commented on it in here before)

Also breast milk blows them up like balloons and when the milk stops it's like a popped balloon. I think petite boobs are super sexy, so it doesn't concern me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's what's perplexing, she weighs more now than before kids. but boobies are now smaller.

she went between D to DD before kids, now after 2 kids, she's down to C.

i learned the other day that cup size is a ratio of boob size to strap size... same size boobs + larger strap = smaller cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right Biscuit...unless you gain or lose weight..boobies just go...down :)

that being said..When I swelled up to cow size, my boobs were DD's...lost 50 lbs...they're now D's...but 12 years ago they were C's when I first met MrPF...and I'm the same size now as I was then...don't think muh boobs will ever be C's again :(....though I thought MrPF was going to cry ...it's like he could see them shrinking by the day

I fail to see a problem here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i learned the other day that cup size is a ratio of boob size to strap size... same size boobs + larger strap = smaller cup.

They seem smaller to the hand test, too. I'll have to keep re-evaluating until I figure it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...