Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 89 million dollar RB committee


CRA

Recommended Posts

6 games in.....

99 rushes, 389 rushing yards, 3.9 per carry, 4 rushing TDs

The 3 COMBINED are on pace for a total of

1037 rushing yards. The most highly invested and paid backfield in NFL history.....Hurney fugging magic indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh CRA, how I hate you so...

For what.....

Oh, bc it is yet another thing I went on and on and on about.....and I look to be right?

Kinda like we should draft Luke bc he is a stud and Beason wouldn't likely be healthy? D sure looks good enough to win some games with rookie Luke in the middle if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you do with 2RBS? You run the hell out of them with fresh legs. Sub them in and out. Remember when we had 2 1,000 yard rushers? (Hard to read but I took that in 2009)

16m0lc.jpg

What do you do with 3RBS? You use one as a badass FB.

What do you do with 3RBS and the best running QB in the league? You run the freaking wishbone or I formation or some damn thing once in a while. get these guys on the field. It's a bunch of talent.

Figure it out Chud

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this could work but we are running so many shotgun plays. We need play action and misdirection out of under center formations to utilize this backfield.

Well, nothing suggests our coaching regime wants anything to do with that....never has.

That is the problem.....Hurney wants X and coaches want Y = fail. Doesn't matter which side you take....it is a front office failure. Not a Cam issue, DeAngelo issue, Steve Smith or Jordan Gross one.....offensive players basically overall are put in a position to fail. They have proven they aren't going to overcome that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...