Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Election Day/Night Coverage thread

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

I will be up all night or as long as necessary to determine the initial winner. I expect many legal challenges ahead though. That's not the point though.

This thread is for anyone watching the coverage on any major network. I will personally be switching back and forth from CNN and Fox. Don't really like CNN whatsoever, but they do have the best maps, and are always ahead of Fox in reporting of precincts...

I think it'd be cool if those that are paying attention would like to just keep this thread running all night and into the am...

I'd be interested to see what others thoughts are as the night progresses. Would love it if there are any really informed people like myself to weigh in... (As far as how the process works, electoral college, ties, slim margins...etc)

Anybody down?

Edit: the reason I posted this here and not in the box, is because I'd like to avoid the "general to foolery"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Politico.com on my laptop, switching networks on the tv. Even though the months and years leading up to this point have been hard to stomach, tonite is what makes this country the best in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      You see, this is why I'm more critical of Dave Canales

      By TD alt · Posted

      He's going way overboard. I mean, men talk this way all the time. Bryce seems like a fine young man. But he's been piss poor at his job. I wish that I could be piss poor at mine---wait, no I don't---and get paid millions.  The thing is, I've supported Bryce in the past, but he doesn't seem to be the type of QB that what I've heard Chris Canry refer to as a "force multiplier." He can't make good players great, he needs great players to make him good. He's not going to pull out a win when times get tough (at least he hasn't), but he becomes good when there is essentially nothing to play for. After trying to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt, and waiting for the light switch to stay on, I'm tired of waiting. I've seen what I need to see, and it ain't pretty. So excuse me for calling Bryce, "pussified" for not being more aggressive in his pursuit of down field plays. He appears to just not have it in him. I'm sorry, Bryce and all Bryce Stans. He's still got to go though.
    • strato
      Legette is a Luxury to the team.

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah me too. We should have taken him. He was a much better bet than most of what you find that far down. He might have been 5 stars coming out of high school, I don’t know. Just that he was highly thought of. His college career didn’t get off to a great start and he ended up on a bad team with bad protection. But you could watch him and see what he had. I don’t see a way he doesn’t have a long career as a #2, at worst. 
    • TD alt
      You see, this is why I'm more critical of Dave Canales

      By TD alt · Posted

      For the record @AceBoogie, I was referring to his unwillingness to push the ball down the damned field. My bad. He just has a problem seeing the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...