Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 times outs 54 seconds

Rags

By Rags,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

I've realized these one score losses we've piled up aren't a coincidence. We had a chance to take a two score lead and Rivera played for one.

Combine that lack of a killer instinct infecting the team when the chips are down, it's plain to see how all thee one score losses have mounted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruff Newbie

Ruff

Posted
Posted

Cam's reaction was very telling. The coaches have lost the players. Much like Tampa last year. We might actually have that number one overall pick after all.

I was actually thinking the same thing. Not about the #1 pick (even though that's entirely possible at this point), but about how the team and the coaches now have a huge disconnect. It's going to get out of hand.

Chud needs to be gone before the game against the Chiefs AT THE LATEST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Off Season Thread

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't believe this at all.
    • kungfoodude
      Off Season Thread

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      His PPG actually did go up a little in Colorado. We will see. I still sort of believe we saw pretty close to the peak of his abilities last year. Not wishing him ill or trashing him in any way. Just tend to believe we did sell high and correctly so.
    • kungfoodude
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Well, other teams also had an offseason. I honestly agree with him. Right now I have way more faith in Coker ascending then I do XL. I think it's the TE/WR group dragging us down. Plus he does mention that the list was made with WR's very much valued more than RB's and TE's(I understand the thought process). In that context, we have a very aging AT, two "wait and see" second year players(one leaning bust) and a rookie.  I really think this is a very fair rating, on paper and in the offseason. Quite frankly, aside from the aforementioned and aging AT, this is a bunch of guys still trying to prove themselves.  Then when you go to TE, it's easily a bottom 3-4 unit on paper. That is probably being extremely generous.  RB is where we make our hay. Probably a top 5-10 unit. But....he mentions early in the article that he doesn't value the RB units as much.  So, really, it's the weighting of the skill positions that is what really fugs us.
×
×
  • Create New...