Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best loss of the season...Why?


Panthers Nation

Recommended Posts

and what do you call someone who "pads his stats..." (quoting from the previous)? Mind you, no mention was made of an effort to win the game. "Padding his stats" was all that was said, so don't try to infer anything that wasn't stated by the poster.

Normally when someone posts something I don't agree with I state my opinion. You called him a stat ***** so I was assuming you supported the opinion that Cam was "padding his stats" while trying to bring his team back to win the game. My mistake....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, okay, I get it...

You're justifying why losing is good, but I'm outta line... okay, cool. Gotcha now, I understand.

Morons, keep trying to convince yourselves why you're right, maybe you'll start believing yourselves soon also.

No. Losing is bad.

I was just pointing out that Cam wasn't stat whoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I was merely pointing out the lunacy of Cam "padding his stats" and attempting to make the franchise more attractive to a potential HC or GM.

I hardly consider a 15/27 for 232 and 3 TDs in a losing effort something a stat wh0re would be proud of....

So you pointed it out the lunacy of the opinion by agreeing with the opinion presented? Great smokescreen bro....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more loser culture stuff, but you know what...i don't care anymore. losing is never acceptable but i'm just too tired of backing a team that does nothing but lose and whose fans are increasingly content with it and see it as some kind of honor being able to pick first overall or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more loser culture stuff, but you know what...i don't care anymore. losing is never acceptable but i'm just too tired of backing a team that does nothing but lose and whose fans are increasingly content with it and see it as some kind of honor being able to pick first overall or whatever.

I think people are just hoping we can get a St Louis type of deal if we do end up picking first. Not saying it's right, but that's what I assume...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you pointed it out the lunacy of the opinion by agreeing with the opinion presented? Great smokescreen bro....

Let's see here. I'm going to use crayons now so you might understand this....

The opinion stated Cam was "padding his stats." I then suggested that Cam "padding his stats" without making mention of any effort to win the game makes him a stat wh0re, then, doesn't it?

WTF is it that you don't get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are just hoping we can get a St Louis type of deal if we do end up picking first. Not saying it's right, but that's what I assume...

i know.

it won't happen.

we'll get stuck with it and won't have anything but another losing record to show for it.

i promise you that it will end up doing more harm than good for this team to pick early.

no one will want to coach it except for people with ron rivera type credentials. prospective GMs will laugh at accorsi for even suggesting such a piss poor team. players we want to stay will want to leave. no player we need via FA will want to come here. only those desperate and team-less for a reason will want to be here.

but hey...we'll at least be able to draft a cool player, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see here. I'm going to use crayons now so you might understand this....

The opinion stated Cam was "padding his stats." I then suggested that Cam "padding his stats" without making mention of any effort to win the game makes him a stat wh0re, then, doesn't it?

WTF is it that you don't get?

I'm done, I think it's pretty obvious to everyone in the thread that you were supporting the original post of Cam padding his stats, instead of pointing out the idiocy of the post to begin with....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...