Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star,Luke or Hankins?

jarhead

By jarhead,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jarhead Newbie

jarhead

Posted
Posted

I think this years first pick is pretty straight forward unless we win a couple more games.I would like either Star or Luke if it is up to me.The Oakland game may decide who gets Star with both teams needs help at DT. 2nd round has a few more options.It appears at wr we could only get a good number 2 so I am not really sure if that is logical. Barret Jones OG,OT,C would be a great pick if he is there or Elam if he should drop a few spots.Other than that it may be the best cb availible

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bwood Newbie

Bwood

Posted
Posted

It depends on what we do with Gross, and what we do with the Edwards'.

If we decide to cut Gross, the pick will be Joeckel.

If we keep Gross, and either Dwan leaves in free agency, or Ron is cut due to age/injury, we will take either star or Hankins depending on that situation.

If Dwan leaves, we need Star. If Ron leaves, we need Hankins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Experienced

La Pantera

Posted
Posted

It depends on what we do with Gross, and what we do with the Edwards'.

If we decide to cut Gross, the pick will be Joeckel.

If we keep Gross, and either Dwan leaves in free agency, or Ron is cut due to age/injury, we will take either star or Hankins depending on that situation.

If Dwan leaves, we need Star. If Ron leaves, we need Hankins.

I think Dwan is under contract for another season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Would take Luke hands down.

You have your young franchise QB....now slide in your stud LT to protect him for the next decade.

You saw how effective Cam is when he gets some time in the pocket.

Luke at LT....Amini at LG (kid is getting better and better)....Kalil in the middle....? at RG....Gross (after he restructures) at RT.

Damn fine OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Would take Luke hands down.

You have your young franchise QB....now slide in your stud LT to protect him for the next decade.

You saw how effective Cam is when he gets some time in the pocket.

Luke at LT....Amini at LG (kid is getting better and better)....Kalil in the middle....? at RG....Gross (after he restructures) at RT.

Damn fine OL.

I rather have a Vet who has experience blocking for Cam than a rookie. Tell me how many rookie OL made immediate impact. We saw Amini struggle this year. I don't want another rookie OL having to go through a learning developing process blocking for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...