Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

caption this photo- ron and mike


BigSyke

Recommended Posts

Ron Rivera has NO right to be a stone statue as his team spirals to 3-9, and then decide he wants to get emotional after winning one meaningless game and yell at one of his exceptional players for being the emotional leader Ron should have been from the beginning. Greg Hardy did the right thing 100 percent absolutely and anyone who thinks he shouldn't have told them to get the fug off our field for the sake of PC "Class" is a spineless tool.

Good for you, Greg. We need 50 more EXACTLY like you and I think you will be wearing a "C" for this team someday.

Fug Ron Rivera. This win, as fun and satisfying as it was to struggle through watching, is absolutely meaningless. We didn't "spoil" ANYTHING. They are locked into the playoffs and will probably still get home field advantage, while we are sitting at home watching them go one and done. Sure this game was a step in the right direction but you made it about 10 weeks too late, fool! The only reason this team won is on the backs of players like Cam, Hardy, Smitty, etc. The only thing you did to help facilitate the win is not hold them back like you ALWAYS do.

Get the fug off our field, Ron Rivera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...