Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Actual vs. Expected Wins: Some Interesting Analysis


Recommended Posts

I did this last night and thought I'd share. A little background. My education is in economics and statistics, and I wanted to start playing around with some stats and start building a model to predict wins and other game statistics. What follows below is just the beginning.

To build a model like this, you have to leverage a technique called regression analysis. I won't bother explaining it, but you can check out Wikipedia if you'd like. In short, regression analysis allows you to estimate the effect of one thing on another thing, all other things being constant. So last night I decided to look at the effect of average margin of victory on win-loss records. Once you estimate the equation that includes the impact of average margin of victory on wins, you can estimate the expected number of wins for each team. Again, what I've done here is very basic, and I'm going to beef it up a lot in the coming months.

In the table below:

The second column is average margin of victory.

The third column is actual wins in 08-09.

The fourth column is what the model predicts based on average margin of victory.

The fifth column is the difference between actual and expected wins.

ActualvsExpected0809.jpg

Basically, this gives us a measure of the degree to which a team underachieved or overachieved based on their average margin of victory.

Those with a positive difference (where expected was greater than actual) are the overachievers. Those with with a negative difference are the underachievers.

Miami and Denver were the biggest overachievers, and there we were at #4, with an expected record of 10-6 based on average margin of victory alone. Green Bay, San Diego, and Phili were the biggest underachievers based on margin of victory.

That's all for now. Hopefully I'll be back with some more interesting stuff in the weeks ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really cool.

Basically we won more games than we should have just looking at our Margin of Victory, That's probably due to Steve Smith and Jake Delhomme Late-Game heroics. It's weird though, I didn't think Detroits MoV was so low... I guess when you lose every game by about 3-5 points it adds up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me be the dummy who asks this: how do you arrive at the margin of victory numbers? Take points against and points for and subtract PA from PF then divide by 16? Or do you use the scores of the games, take the point differentials, then average that?

Very interesting topic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like it and i have some things i'd like to ask you about it but the first thing i want to know is what you used as the basis for expected wins?

not really a stats background. my education was in telling people that know how to do stats what to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have thought that MoV would be an accurate predictor of record, but that numbers seem to make sense. I've looked to try to find one team's figures that I disagree with and really can't argue with any of them.

Good job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did this last night and thought I'd share. A little background. My education is in economics and statistics, and I wanted to start playing around with some stats and start building a model to predict wins and other game statistics. What follows below is just the beginning.

To build a model like this, you have to leverage a technique called regression analysis. I won't bother explaining it, but you can check out Wikipedia if you'd like. In short, regression analysis allows you to estimate the effect of one thing on another thing, all other things being constant. So last night I decided to look at the effect of average margin of victory on win-loss records. Once you estimate the equation that includes the impact of average margin of victory on wins, you can estimate the expected number of wins for each team. Again, what I've done here is very basic, and I'm going to beef it up a lot in the coming months.

In the table below:

The second column is average margin of victory.

The third column is actual wins in 08-09.

The fourth column is what the model predicts based on average margin of victory.

The fifth column is the difference between actual and expected wins.

ActualvsExpected0809.jpg

Basically, this gives us a measure of the degree to which a team underachieved or overachieved based on their average margin of victory.

Those with a positive difference (where expected was greater than actual) are the overachievers. Those with with a negative difference are the underachievers.

Miami and Denver were the biggest overachievers, and there we were at #4, with an expected record of 10-6 based on average margin of victory alone. Green Bay, San Diego, and Phili were the biggest underachievers based on margin of victory.

That's all for now. Hopefully I'll be back with some more interesting stuff in the weeks ahead.

*single tear*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What it feels like is a horrible source reality. What a person sees is a horrible source for reality. Stats can be easily misunderstood because because they are interpretive and contextual. Very large data sets with dozens more more connected variables are difficult to deal with and understand correctly. Throw in confirmation bias, abstraction, emotions and the way human brains are wired make it really easy to roll with eye tests and intuition. The negativity for Bryce was really high and most were ready to trade that asset for peanuts until the second half of last year when he began to play much, much better.  Hope sprang eternal.  The Saints game last year.  Going toe to toe and almost beating the two teams who went to the Superbowl last year.  Beating the Falcons when the Falcons had everything to play for.  Haters started adjusting their tune. Fan and media starting saying it looks like Carolina has found their franchise QB.   The real answer was and is, maybe. If he plays great on Sunday the anti-Bryce crowd will find other excuses or say it's only one game. If he plays horrible, it'll be more of the "I told you so. I knew it before he was drafted." (which is beyond stupid since there there is not an actual way to know if a player will be successful in the NFL or not.) I'll leave with a simple example.  Of the initial list of incompletions due to WR error, Jarod Goff has 0.  He was 31 for 39 at an almost 80% completion percentage.  His WR's much has balled out. Except when you add the facts that only 11 of those passes were to WRs.  14 were to RB's and 6 to the TE.  Gibbs has 10 of those receptions and he's elite so that explains why we shouldn't put much stock into this stat.  But then we see that Gibbs also set an NFL record with the least number of yards (31) for any player with at least 10 receptions in a game. Fun stuff! Oh yeah.  From week 1 how many people had Justin Fields and Daniel Jones playing at elite levels?   
    • How do you reconcile with the fact that the most competent and productive the Panthers passing offense has looked at any point between 2023 and 2025 were both games where Andy Dalton (who is completely washed and terrible) started? 680 passing yards and 5 touchdowns in two games. And one of those games was with Frank Reich as the head coach. This team needs competent QB play.
    • If we're in position and he is there, he will absolutely be the pick. He goes to South Carolina after all
×
×
  • Create New...