Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nfl.com Writer Mentions Our Future

beastson

By beastson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

Second that!

And all the people that argued with me about Lafell early in the season all a sudden can't be find.

This dude goes Casper in too many games to be a number 2. Panthers fans have got their expectations so low that they think LaFell is a number 2? Come on fellas. Right now in a number two we are looking for a replacement for Smitty and someone that WE KNOW can get 1,000 yds receiving. Do we have that with LaFell? Absolutely not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

Lafell is already a good number 2. Too many of you think absurdly unrealistically like most teams run around with White/Jones or Fitz/Bolden-esq duos at receiver.

yeah. There's always room for improvement, but LaFell does well enough. He's option #3. You have to get Smith and Olsen looks first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jarhead Newbie

jarhead

Posted
Posted

To me he disappears in games to much.He is making just shy of 3 receptions per game which is not enough for a possession receiver.Moose was my idea of a good number 2 wr with over twice the receptions of LaFell and averaging close to 800 yards per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

This dude goes Casper in too many games to be a number 2. Panthers fans have got their expectations so low that they think LaFell is a number 2? Come on fellas. Right now in a number two we are looking for a replacement for Smitty and someone that WE KNOW can get 1,000 yds receiving. Do we have that with LaFell? Absolutely not.

Someone finally agree with me on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dont Check My Chicken Newbie

Dont Check My Chicken

Posted
Posted

When the author states "the new guy will likely want to install his own systems and schemes", he assumes this is a detriment to the team and that staying the course with failed systems and schemes is better. Furthermore, it does NOT consider the poor clock management skills exhibited by RR. This is biased AND misleading reporting unworthy of serious consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Yeah no one else has been saying this about Lafell ever.

You're the only one Chuck.

Well for whatever reasons, when I was calling him out early of the season no one backed me up. I didn't see you there making this argument with me did I. It was only me vs 20+ members.

And can y'all huddlers quit acting like y'all know me by calling me by my name. Gosh it sounds horrible. Call me by my user name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who Said What? Newbie

Who Said What?

Posted
Posted

Maybe him going Casper has something to do with the game plan. Even if you have two good recievers, doesn't mean they are going to have similar stats. We all know Olsen is good, but he went two or three games with low numbers. i am not saying that Lafell has not dissapointed at times(namely the KC drop), but seven hundred recieving yards is not an easy accomplishment. Especially when we are trying to force feed Smitty through out the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted

Well for whatever reasons, when I was calling him out early of the season no one backed me up. I didn't see you there making this argument with me did I. It was only me vs 20+ members.

Made a few threads earlier about him and many of the replies saying he went ghost often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...