Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It was nice knowing you DeAngelo


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

Keeping overpaid players because of a great performance in a meaningless game at the end of the season is a terrible way to run a franchise.

If DWill and Stewart are on this roster to start next year then the front office doesnt understand the modern NFL. I like them both, but its true.

He wouldn't be considered overpaid if he would've been used properly the way he has the last few weeks. You have to look a little deeper to understand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wouldn't be considered overpaid if he would've been used properly the way he has the last few weeks. You have to look a little deeper to understand

No, he is overpaid because NFL rbs dont make that much money. Deangelo is not Adrian Peterson, and he isnt going to get 20 carries per game. He is overpaid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wouldn't be considered overpaid if he would've been used properly the way he has the last few weeks. You have to look a little deeper to understand

I think you need to look deeper to understand, we have way to much money invested at one position. Rb's are dime a dozen, we need to free up some cap, and thats a place to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he would get us more than that. We'd easily get a 3rd. but there is no way we trade now that they figured out how to use him and he is lighting teams up

No we wouldn't and he won't break 500 yards next year if he is a Panther.

When you trade a player, you are trading the non-guaranteed portion of the contract as well. When you have a player that is way overpaid for production, it absolutely kills their trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...