Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you take in rds 1 and 2


philw5289

Recommended Posts

1st: Jesse Williams, DT, Alabama

2nd: Cordarrelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee

I personally think Patterson will be long gone, but if by some miracle he's still there we have to take this guy. He's lightening in a bottle and has the kind of natural playmaking ability rarely seen, even if he is very raw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where the fug are people getting the idea that Jesse will be available in the second?

If we're gonna post without putting any thought or research like this than give me Star Lotulelei and Luke Joeckel.

as of right now he's projected as a late first or early second. he's behind star,hankins,richardson and maybe john jenkins or shariff floyd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as of right now he's projected as a late first or early second. he's behind star,hankins,richardson and maybe john jenkins or shariff floyd

And who the fug is that according to? If you got your info from walterfootball or CBS than please just don't even respond LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay where do you get your rankings from kiper jr?

It's called evaluating your own prospects and making rankings according to the tape you watch. Not youtube highlights. Full games of every snap whatever prospect your watching.

Walterfootball and Rob Rang have as much credibility as my dick. I'm not a scout whatsoever, but after all the years of evaluating talent and reading Walter/CBS's poo, I can safely say I trust my opinion over theirs all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called evaluating your own prospects and making rankings according to the tape you watch. Not youtube highlights. Full games of every snap whatever prospect your watching.

Walterfootball and Rob Rang have as much credibility as my dick. I'm not a scout whatsoever, but after all the years of evaluating talent and reading Walter/CBS's poo, I can safely say I trust my opinion over theirs all day.

who has time to do that. no thanks. I would rather just give my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called evaluating your own prospects and making rankings according to the tape you watch. Not youtube highlights. Full games of every snap whatever prospect your watching.

Walterfootball and Rob Rang have as much credibility as my dick. I'm not a scout whatsoever, but after all the years of evaluating talent and reading Walter/CBS's poo, I can safely say I trust my opinion over theirs all day.

Why not just go ahead, save us the suspense of waiting til April and post EXACTLY what is going to happen. It seems you have the most knowledge and inside information. No use in having this forum afterwards, as we can just occasionally check in to see what you and your dick have determined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Totally.  I'm less comparing them as players and using him as a reference point.  I legitimately think Bryce is capable of being a better NFL QB than Kyler has been.  Kyler has no clutch gene and doesn't seem to have a grip on the locker room, or much love for the game.  Much different body types/strengths and weaknesses.   Crazy to think-- but Kyler is at year 7 as a 1.01...38-48-1 on his career, 0-1 in the playoffs. He's somehow played well enough to keep it going but crazy to think he's barely even touched the playoffs.  Hasn't done anything that special for the Cards.  That's what you don't want to be stuck in.  Cardinals are in softball purgatory with him.    
    • It's not analysis. There was no attempt to analyze anything or even convey new information at all.
    • As to the topic, I've complained before about "superstar" mentality, i.e. the notion that you can win championships with one superstar player surrounded by a group of mediocre fill ins. It just doesn't work. The Manning-Brady rivalry was something of a showcase for that. The Colts general approach focused everything on Manning. The Patriots? Oh, they also had a superstar quarterback but they built a complete team, especially on the defensive side. This sort of thing is why I've argued many times that "system quarterback" should be to considered a description, not an insult. I know everybody loves the "MVP" athletic types, and they're fun to watch, but that's not necessarily the true path to consistent winning and championship glory.
×
×
  • Create New...