Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Olsen "snubbed"?


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

Kyle Rudolph of the Minnesota Vikings have replace Tony Gonzalez in the Pro Bowl. Rodolph is a very good young Tight End who caught 9 TD passes this season, but really? Greg Olsen had a much better season imo; 69rec, 843yds, 12.2avg, 5tds compare to Rudolph's 53rec, 493yds, 9.3avg, 9tds.

For whatever reason, Im just thinking that people just hate the Panthers. Sure we're a bad team (7-9), but I mean the FUGGN' Cheifs (2-14) worst team in the league this year are sending a total of 6 players to the Pro Bowl (Berry, Charles, Colquitt, Hali, Houston, and Johnson).

Where the hell is Luke59???? Thats all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Cam nearly got killed at his Pro Bowl appearance I hope every Panther from here on out has a strained hammy and doesn't attend.

Fug 'em.

Ever since that Pro Bowl incident, I was wishing and praying for one of our DE's to make it to the Pro Bowl just to go Ham on the AFC, mainly against Manning, Luck and Schaub if he made it..... I knew Brady would find a way out of it. But man did I want to see those guys hit those QB's every single damn down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read my post. "Chiefs"??? 6 players PB with worst record.

I mean at least Kuechly man. I have a feeling Luke is going to get rob already of DROY

I agree with you, we should at least have Luke and Olsen (and maybe Hardy) in there, but this is a popularity poll. Chiefs players in there are absolute BS, but we just have to win games, get the names on the air and people will vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...