Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam making the Super Bowl rounds: Rome, SVP, PFT etc.


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Not sure what time he's gonna be on Rome, but I'll update later. The show runs from 12pm-3pm and can be heard on iheartradio station 1320 KFAN out of Utah.

All I can say is its about damn time he got some first-hand national media exposure. It's time for the organization (or his handlers) to take the kiddie gloves off and introduce the Cam we know to the entire country.

EDIT: Just found out he's going to be on SVP's show today as well. Sounds like he's making the rounds in New Orleans. He'll probably be on quite a few other outlets as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rome is the closet thing the Panthers have to a national guy in the media supporting them. He's a huge Steve Smith fan.

The question is: Does he watch the games, or just reading off of a stat sheet?

Unless Rome is a cordial host, don't expect much from Cam. Cause if Rome goes after him with stereotypes and media BS (unless he wants Cam to defend himself), and Cam is calm, gracious and diplomatic, there will be no news.

Now if he tries to defend himself, he can say something that the media can/will use against him for a 24hr cycle before the Superbowl. Good thing today is Friday. But I don't think he would. LOL.

Here's hoping for a good football interview, and not some character defense BS.

We'll see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is: Does he watch the games, or just reading off of a stat sheet?

Unless Rome is a cordial host, don't expect much from Cam. Cause if Rome goes after him with stereotypes and media BS (unless he wants Cam to defend himself), and Cam is calm, gracious and diplomatic, there will be no news.

Now if he tries to defend himself, he can say something that the media can/will use against him for a 24hr cycle before the Superbowl. Good thing today is Friday. But I don't think he would. LOL.

Here's hoping for a good football interview, and not some character defense BS.

We'll see?

Rome is actually a pretty good interviewer, I doubt he's gonna "go after" Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...