Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yeah, It's Another Cordarrelle Patterson Thread

Jakob

By Jakob,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
Posted

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zsWCMyjdZA

Yeah, he needs to be developed, I know he only played one year, He has a lot of criticism, the criticism and doubt reminds me of the same criticism and doubt that surrounded Cam in 2010. I think we can fill the DT, OL, and other needs in the free agency and the rest of the draft. Our defense was developing very well last year, Cam needs a WR like this and the Panthers need it long term for when the day comes that Steve can't be Steve anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

playmakers and multi-threat players like him make the players around him better because defenses always have to be accounting for him. it would be like having a dual threat WR to go along with your dual threat QB. how could that be a bad thing?

and then add in that we'd have a legit return man....which we don't have.

and for the next few years he'd absolutely be doing returns. guys with his skill set you find as many ways to get the ball in his hands as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

the more I think about it, the more I'm on board with taking this guy in the first

yep. my discussions have been more just to talk about why he shouldn't be ruled out in the first or really just WR, tbh. i wasn't any more sold on him or WR than safety, DT, or OL, but the more I've looked at him, the more i like this idea. he'd be a huge pick up for us. i just don't see him lasting till 14 so none of it really matters, tho. just as long as we dont ignore WR again and pick one up in the first couple rounds or pick up a solid WR in FA (but I'd still us rather address OL and DT in FA).

my hope has been all along some combo of FS and WR in the first couple rounds. right now my favorite pick is patterson in the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

yep. my discussions have been more just to talk about why he shouldn't be ruled out in the first or really just WR, tbh. i wasn't any more sold on him or WR than safety, DT, or OL, but the more I've looked at him, the more i like this idea. he'd be a huge pick up for us. i just don't see him lasting till 14 so none of it really matters, tho. just as long as we dont ignore WR again and pick one up in the first couple rounds or pick up a solid WR in FA (but I'd still us rather address OL and DT in FA).

my hope has been all along some combo of FS and WR in the first couple rounds. right now my favorite pick is patterson in the first.

I still want to get a young DT and Olinemen out of this deep class no matter what we do in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Friday camp news and notes

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...