Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Olsen speaking to state government


Zod

Recommended Posts

I understand where he is coming from and appreciate his concern, but I have a problem with anyone telling me I have to do anything especially when it comes to my children.

Pulse ox is non evasive it is the little red light thing they place on your finger to check the amount of oxygen circulating in one blood in a babies case they can place it on the stomach often the little teddy bear sticker you see on babies. It's not that serious to get All papa bear and it saves lives I work in healthcare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much some big hospital group is paying olsen to be their poster child for this.

Childbirth is the most profitable part of the hospital. One more test = more billing to insurance = more $$ for novant/carolina's healthcare/etc.

To teh tinderbox!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much some big hospital group is paying olsen to be their poster child for this.

Childbirth is the most profitable part of the hospital. One more test = more billing to insurance = more $$ for novant/carolina's healthcare/etc.

To teh tinderbox!

Why do you hate capitalism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He has been a starter most of his career.  Why does anyone thing he would willing come here to be our 3rd TE?  
    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
×
×
  • Create New...