Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An (mildly) interesting Jake Delhomme statistic


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

Technically it is Couch followed by Anderson.

I met a personal friend of Jake's on a boat in Belize last month, neat.

.500 baby!

Kinda' sums up his tenure here in Carolina huh? Winning season one year, then 8-8 or 7-9 the next. I still love me some Delhomme though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically it is Couch followed by Anderson.

I met a personal friend of Jake's on a boat in Belize last month, neat.

By winning percentage, he's the best. Pretty small sample, though. If you applied a minimum qualifier, he'd probably be discounted.

Still, what's it say about your team when .500 is your best QB record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always knew the Browns had been bad and never really gave it much thought, but holy hell. This is their W/L record since they returned to the NFL:

1999: 2-14

2000: 3-13

2001: 7-9

2002: 9-7

2003: 5-11

2004: 4-12

2005: 6-10

2006: 4-12

2007: 10-6 (oh snap, finally got things going?)

2008: 4-12 (lolnope)

2009: 5-11

2010: 5-11 (^^well finally some consistency I guess...)

2011: 4-12

2012: 5-11

I know these past few years we don't really have much room to talk, but Jesus Christ that's horrible. At least we kinda' hover around mediocrity and then have spurts of being awesome... aaaaand then back to being mediocre again. We've really only had 3 (4 if you count 6-10) terrible years versus the current Browns---which virtually their whole existence has been pretty terrible.

So I guess my point was... yeah, at least we're not the Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently

Delhomme .592%

Moore .538%

Peete .533%

Collins .523%

Beuerlein .451%

Newton .406%

Weinke .105%

Clausen .100%

Delhomme must be a wizard or something. In his first starting year he took a young franchise to the Super Bowl that was just two seasons removed from a 1-15 season, and he also broke even with the Browns. The Browns...

I'm not sure which is more impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...