Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2008: We got an F+


davos

Recommended Posts

i'm pretty sure i don't care what some site thinks of us when they give us an F+ for not having enough white players on the team in starting roles.

the site is a waste of space. their writers are wastes of oxygen.

their opinions truly don't matter and should be ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm pretty sure i don't care what some site thinks of us when they give us an F+ for not having enough white players on the team in starting roles.

the site is a waste of space. their writers are wastes of oxygen.

their opinions truly don't matter and should be ignored.

Wow! when I read that I didn't even think about why they were talking about white players. I bet the basketball articles are a joy to read. And I bet they love Hockey and Golf.... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...