Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Battlefield 4 preview (17 minutes)


g5jamz

Recommended Posts

Surely that's next Gen graphics, right?

It doesn't look much different then BF3 on PC tbh. Here's a few screens from BF3 single player. Models might be slightly better in the BF4 preview, but the main difference will be the level of destruction, and the number of models on the screen at a time. Lighting is a bit better for sure. Granted this is probably pre Alpha code and it's a brand new engine so still stuff to figure out. Still, I don't expect the graphics to be a monumental difference from BF3. At least not on PC. It doesn't really matter though, because BF3 still looks pretty incredible. The developer who really needs to step up in the graphics department is Activision with CoD, Not to mention they need to make huge strides in gameplay......

bf32013-03-2912-46-14-76_zps67b99211.png

bf32013-03-2912-48-59-53_zpsd7f167ac.png

bf32013-03-2912-53-33-04_zps003bee2e.png

bf32013-03-2912-53-38-13_zps90d55657.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah CoD is terrible in comparison. That and no dedicated servers is just bad.

It's hard to get people to drop the CoD-crack though and move to BF.

Just play both...I do. CoD isn't bad, it's just different. But I will agree that the fact that they have no dedicated servers is absolutely terrible. I can't go a match without a host migration.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess to me, CoD is just stale and inferior in a lot of ways.

With the money they make, there is no excuse for not having dedicated servers other than greed. If BF3 can do it, they can. BF3 has way more going on. Besides, if they do what BF3 did, and let players rent servers, eventually they won't even be paying for most of the servers out there. I know on BF3, Xbox, most of the servers are player owned servers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • In 2023 their roster wasn’t stacked. They nailed the poo out of the 2023 draft and since they knew Davis Mills wasn’t the guy, they tanked properly to get pick 2. They also took Cleveland’s ridiculous offer for Watson unlike us with Burns. Houston received enough draft capital to jump up to 3 while picking up the right guys in Anderson and Stroud. The Texans were not stacked or better than us in 2023. They had 11 total wins from 2020 to 2022. They didn’t have a terrible front office so they made sure they got their QB of the future while tanking well and getting more draft picks. They are a textbook study of what we should have done in 2022/2023 offseason even though people in here still think tanking is a bad word and our culture would be bad if we were the Texans. We literally had the chance to be the Texans right now and fuged it up.
    • Lol. This kills me. If Thielen is our most reliable WR, that’s a problem. We’ve spent two 1sts and found a gem of an UDFA in our last two drafts above and beyond the trading DJ Moore and multiple 1sts and 2nds for Young. Thielen isn’t going to be part of any future we have and if we can’t survive losing him for a 4th, that says more about us needing a new QB and another 2 WRs. After our past 3 drafts, that’s better not be the case. Either we’ve got the young WRs and QB or we don’t. Keeping Thielen at age 35 shouldn’t be a priority unless you are saying Legette, TMac and Young can’t produce without him.
    • So where would Tank and Nico be on this team's depth chart? At least 1 and 3 with TMac. 1 and 2 if TMac needs a little time to adjust.
×
×
  • Create New...