Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Battlefield 4 preview (17 minutes)

g5jamz

By g5jamz,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Surely that's next Gen graphics, right?

It doesn't look much different then BF3 on PC tbh. Here's a few screens from BF3 single player. Models might be slightly better in the BF4 preview, but the main difference will be the level of destruction, and the number of models on the screen at a time. Lighting is a bit better for sure. Granted this is probably pre Alpha code and it's a brand new engine so still stuff to figure out. Still, I don't expect the graphics to be a monumental difference from BF3. At least not on PC. It doesn't really matter though, because BF3 still looks pretty incredible. The developer who really needs to step up in the graphics department is Activision with CoD, Not to mention they need to make huge strides in gameplay......

bf32013-03-2912-46-14-76_zps67b99211.png

bf32013-03-2912-48-59-53_zpsd7f167ac.png

bf32013-03-2912-53-33-04_zps003bee2e.png

bf32013-03-2912-53-38-13_zps90d55657.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted

Yeah CoD is terrible in comparison. That and no dedicated servers is just bad.

It's hard to get people to drop the CoD-crack though and move to BF.

Just play both...I do. CoD isn't bad, it's just different. But I will agree that the fact that they have no dedicated servers is absolutely terrible. I can't go a match without a host migration.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I guess to me, CoD is just stale and inferior in a lot of ways.

With the money they make, there is no excuse for not having dedicated servers other than greed. If BF3 can do it, they can. BF3 has way more going on. Besides, if they do what BF3 did, and let players rent servers, eventually they won't even be paying for most of the servers out there. I know on BF3, Xbox, most of the servers are player owned servers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • PantherChris
      PFF grades from last night...Ransom had a night

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Bear Hands
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...