Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

you should see spring breakers


Recommended Posts

I have heard its more artsy and deeper than you think. The dir is a Terrance Malick wannabe and maybe the studios didn't know how to market this.

it's a mid/borderline high-brow movie being marketed as a dumb party film along the lines of a project x. the meat of it draws parallels between youthful hedonism and crime, nihilism, violence, and that kind of thing. the over the top sexuality is the main thing that people are talking about (i'm surprised it wasn't handed an nc-17 rating to be honest) but it's intended to be grotesque, unsettling, and disorienting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a mid/borderline high-brow movie being marketed as a dumb party film along the lines of a project x. the meat of it draws parallels between youthful hedonism and crime, nihilism, violence, and that kind of thing. the over the top sexuality is the main thing that people are talking about (i'm surprised it wasn't handed an nc-17 rating to be honest) but it's intended to be grotesque, unsettling, and disorienting.

After reading that, I now have an interest in seeing it. You are like the freakin Siskel and Ebert of the Huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm 27 now and it's hard for me to look at 18-20 year old women naked or otherwise. I feel dirty, they are like children to me. It's weird how my tastes have aged at the same rate as I have.

I'm 37 and have no issue with it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm 37 and have no issue with it at all.

I certainly don't mind admiring the beauty of girls that young (18-22)... probably because as a father, I only have boys... I think it would be different if I had girls...

I will say however, if they LOOK younger than 18 it's definitely a no go... I have no interest in underage girls even if they only look underage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly don't mind admiring the beauty of girls that young (18-22)... probably because as a father, I only have boys... I think it would be different if I had girls...

I will say however, if they LOOK younger than 18 it's definitely a no go... I have no interest in underage girls even if they only look underage.

My former brother-in-law was the biggest horndog I ever met. He has a daughter who's turning 12 or 13 this year.

I used to say giving him a daughter was God's revenge :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly don't mind admiring the beauty of girls that young (18-22)... probably because as a father, I only have boys... I think it would be different if I had girls...

I will say however, if they LOOK younger than 18 it's definitely a no go... I have no interest in underage girls even if they only look underage.

Bingo....having a daughter changed it all for me. Since I split with my ex I dated one girl that was in her mid 20's and it was still awkward for me and I couldn't do it. Since then I have pretty much dated women older than me maybe to punish myself for the 26 year old. Well played God, well played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think I'm a little beyond this movie, age-wise. My daughter used to watch those girls on the Disney channel. No way I could watch them getting busy now. She'll want to see it, too. After reading the synopsis on IMDB, there's no way in hell I'm letting her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think I'm a little beyond this movie, age-wise. My daughter used to watch those girls on the Disney channel. No way I could watch them getting busy now. She'll want to see it, too. After reading the synopsis on IMDB, there's no way in hell I'm letting her.

She'll most likely just download it and watch it anyway...or wait till a friend has a copy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When you look closely at the play it was careless from Melo but bang bang full speed I don’t think it was intentional or dirty or deserving of a foul. Bam’s off balance momentum was already carrying him towards a fall and even if Melo didn’t touch him it may have had the exact same outcome. And honestly I think he did try to sell it more when he felt LaMelo’s hand. Dudes arms flopped back instead of bracing for the fall. Sucks he got hurt but a suspension would be ridiculous and an awful look for the league. Fine and move on
    • Sure but it literally would be benching him lol, and it would kill his confidence. He’ll get back in a rhythm, kid just had an all time great rookie season and led the league in 3s, you gotta stick with him as starter. But yeah I’m all for getting some more lineups throughout the game with Coby and Melo   and yeah Miles’ block and Coby and others jumping him in celebration was fuging epic
    • I would’ve used the timeout on that inbounds before the turnover and Melo’s late foul but yeah otherwise I can’t blame Lee, the players just didn’t execute as well as they should have, but obviously did enough to get it done
×
×
  • Create New...