Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Somebody talk Bioshock: Infinite with me.


Growl

Recommended Posts

Spoilers, obviously.

Because nobody I know has played it. Just got done with a second playthrough and I have to say, as amazing as the plot was the first time around, playing through it the second, understanding all the importance of so many tiny little things throughout the course of the game. it was a masterpiece plot wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just beat the game last night. I sat down to play it for the 2nd time about 10:30 last night, and just got lost in it, fast forward to 5am and i was sitting there just mindblown by the ending, although I'm still not sure if it was just an easy way out to the whole 'tears in reality' thing , writing wise. With that being said, though, I enjoyed the game immensely and I plan to play it again all the way through in a few weeks to soak in what I know now.

I think the ending has inflated the scores considerably, and I have read a lot of criticism about how there are no "choices", although I kinda saw that as part of the underlying theme of the story in the first place. Bring back the girl, repay the debt. I think as videogames go, the art direction was amazing and it has been probably absent from most every other game I've played since the original Bioshock.

It doesn't reinvent the wheel with gameplay, it's not epic by open-world free roam standards at all, and the story gets a little bit muddled in the middle, but overall I thoroughly enjoyed it.....as evidenced by my intended casual sit down to play an hour or two and ended up being a marathon to the ending.

Once Elizabeth gets taken and you start finding recordings of her, see Old Elizabeth destroying New York, things started to come together but I don't think it will all set in perfectly until I can see everything again.

And I know the Lutece twins will make a LOT more sense in their meta-arguments and the rhetorical questions that they continually pose.

My favorite part of playing the game?

The Railways :D of course, although from what I saw in early gameplay footage, it seems like they were scaled down a bit. A little disappointed that it wasn't more massive in scale but it didn't need to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, and I have read a lot of criticism about how there are no "choices", although I kinda saw that as part of the underlying theme of the story in the first place.

Dead on. Your choices meaning nothing ties into Elizabeth's "swim in different oceans, land on the same shore" speech near the end when you see another Booker and Elizabeth walking near you. While the point of the game is rooted in the theory that there are an infinite number of universes each spawned by diverging choices, it was making the point that Comstock was still a massive threat in an Infinite amount of universes because of so many choices that happened within that universe, which segued into the ending with Booker needing to prevent any of it from happening. Very intelligent writing, and this explanation is really simplifying it and taking away from how amazingly complex it was.

As much as I loved the Lutece "twins" and their philosophical input into the game-it truly was great- my favorite part of the game came when I was in my second play through and realized that the universe you went to where Booker was a vox martyr was the end result of one of the attempts by the Lutece "twins" previous 122 attempts (evidenced by the chalk board at the beginning of the game) to rescue Elizabeth via Booker. Collecting Booker's voxophones and hearing how he responded to a few divergences in the timeline and created another storyline entirely I'm his universe was just a great moment for me where I just truly appreciated and was wowed at the plot as a whole. It was really great how well demonstrated how a couple things differently drastically changed things-and then the fact that we got to hear how it happened and witness it all first hand? Just totally tripped me out. Awesome writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking forward to playing this when it goes on sale

still not interested in the 2nd one

2nd one was sub-par

3rd is definitely better. different from the first, though. seems to be a lot of running and gunning, it's pretty fast paced compared to the others. i've enjoyed it so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking forward to playing this when it goes on sale

still not interested in the 2nd one

If you like the first one the sequel is good enough I suppose even though it's completely pointless and doesn't really add anything to the world. If you just really like messing around in Rapture then I'd pick it up so you'd have some variety besides playing Bioshock 1 over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infinite is incredible. I don't really know how else to describe the game, after the second playthrough. The combat mechanics of the game are a little lackluster, and feel as though they came out in 2008, but that doesn't take away from the incredible narrative of the game.

The whole idea of a Schrodinger's Universe (multi-verse) where there are infinite lives in which you've lived and infinite choices that you have made and simultaneously have not made, is mind blowing. Especially lived out in a way that even takes you through places like the Infinite Lighthouses or even the trip back through Rapture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure why everyone keeps talking about the Panthers paying him $50M/year. I don't recall anyone EVER saying he deserves that. I think something like what the Dolphins signed Malik Willis to would be good: 3 years, $67.5M but it will probably be something along the lines of Mayfield or Darnold which is around $35M/year.
    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
×
×
  • Create New...