Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Xbox to require always on internet connection?


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

If this is true, I'm done with Xbox and will buy the new playstation 4 (assuming that doesn't require always on connection).

http://www.gamespot.com/news/subscription-based-xbox-720-priced-at-300-with-500-standard-model-6406544

Not sure how this will affect sales, but I can't see how this is a good thing for the consumer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of their guys posted this gem on twitter. So I'd say unless they make a last minute change (not likely and not very feasable either.) then that the next xbox will require an internet connection and I'd wager that all games have to install on the HD rumor will turn out to be true as well. I think It's so they can keep an eye on used games early on in the cycle and then prevent them with keys later on down the road.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/04/05/microsoft-creative-director-on-always-online-deal-with-it

jF1Mjq5MZmVHd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you made the mistake of thinking your average early teens xbox addict gives a poo about this

I doubt it affects sales

A bunch of parents either don't allow their kids to hook them up to the internet. Then you've got the more rural area's that don't have reliable internet connections and then you have people with satellite internet connections that aren't reliable during storms or cloudy days type of poo as well. You also have people that just don't have internet. Then there are those that use their cellphones or tablets for everything internet related so they don't have a traditional ISP either.

This will most definitely effect sales and the bottom line for the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on xbox live a ton, but I don't like being required to have the connection constant. Sometimes my internet goes out, and that should stop me from playing games? Crazy. I will not be buying the next Xbox if these rumors are true, and I had been planning on getting one instead of a PS4 (like I got the 360 and not a PS3). Looks like PS4 and their crappy controller will have my business back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know one person that has an xbox that doesn't have internet. I'm sure microsoft has done their own research to confirm that this is pretty much the case.

People will buy the same console that their friends are getting and don't care about dumb features such as this.

So you're ok if for some reason you don't have internet access and your NextBox turns into a place mat?

Good for you, you can buy it then. And don't be so sure that people don't care about this issue...go to ANY gaming site and most people are not happy about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm certainly not okay at all with this and I'm not buying any garbage they put out regardless. People are bitching now but once it releases people won't care.

If people aren't gonna raise hell when you pay a premium for services that are free on literally every single electronic device on the market.. for youtube netflix and an internet browser.. I don't think the always on deal is gonna be any different.

Yeah the hypestorm of a new console kinda amplifies things and the forums are probably livid right now but just wait until their shiny new military shooter comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean personally I think the only way to play video games now is online versus multiple people. Playing the computer is so boring to me. Story modes are almost never as exciting as whooping ass online. If I had to play xbox with no internet now days I'd just throw the sht away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both a xbox and PS3, I usually play online anyway but like others said sometimes the internet is slow or down and that will suck to not even be able to play.... oh and I like Xbox way better than my PS3, online is just way better and easier as far as talking and playing with friends

I hated the PS3 controller, but you can buy PS3 controllers that are the same design and size as xbox just gotta look for it.

EASports Sucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do it they'll be losing my support and I've been on team xbox ever since the beginning. I live in a really rural area where the internet is usually out just as much as it is on and unless I'm planning on playing something online I keep my console disconnected anyways. Microsoft has always been greedy, but if they do this poo chances are their greed will kill their fan base.

But then again the opposite could happen and developers could embrace the Nextbox and only release their big titles on it since the constantly online thing could essenstially do away with the used game market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I don't really play video games anymore, this is ridiculous.

When I did play video games I rarely played online (didn't have Xbox live for that long) and was much more interested playing the story mode, or in a local game with my buddies.

This will likely backfire on Microsoft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...